LDK
← All projectsLightning Dev Kit

rust-lightning

Composable Rust libraries for building Lightning wallets, nodes, and services.

BitcoinCryptographic librariesLightning NetworkNormal
Repository coverage

1655 commits in the local evidence base

Every captured commit receives deterministic security triage and a separate communication-quality score. Security candidates and broader second-pass signals receive full-patch Ollama analysis.

249security candidates223second-pass queue1517AI analyses
88commits · 30 days
195commits · 60 days
565commits · 180 days
1307commits · 365 days
Backfill bands
Aug 5 → Feb 6819 seen18 candidatesComplete
Feb 6 → Jun 6468 seen16 candidatesComplete
Jun 6 → Jul 6128 seen8 candidatesComplete
Jul 6 → Aug 561 seen3 candidatesComplete
Commit communication

Does the history explain itself?

Message quality measures whether a commit identifies its scope, purpose, rationale, testing, and supporting references. It does not change the security-severity score.

70/100 average clarity
470Strong · 80–100
830Adequate · 60–79
293Thin · 40–59
62Opaque · 0–39
3security candidates with opaque commit messaging
Read the scoring rubric →
Developer activity

Who is changing the project?

Public Git author strings; identities are not independently verified.

DeveloperCommitsCandidatesAnalyzedHigh riskMessage avg.
Elias Rohrer15315153667
Matt Corallo43452370574
Jeffrey Czyz19545182169
Wilmer Paulino15945155169
Leo Nash11613116162
Valentine Wallace14010135169
Vincenzo Palazzo11311183
Joost Jager16224162069
elnosh371331057
auto-pr-bot2478087
shaavan22622069
Carla Kirk-Cohen78366068
Analysis record

Published AI watches

Last scanned 48 minutes ago

Informational 19 AI analysisMessage 81 · Strong
LDK Lightning Dev Kitrust-lightning BitcoinCryptographic librariesLightning Network

Merge PR 'tx-sync: Parallelize esplora status queries' (#4913)

This commit rewrites how a Lightning wallet talks to Esplora block-explorer servers so that many status checks happen in parallel instead of one at a time. It is a performance/refactoring change. There is no direct evidence in the commit t…

Concurrency/timing change in transaction confirmation logicNew inconsistency check preserved when a previously-confirmed tx is reported unconfirmedAdded defensive error path for missing pre-fetched block status
c303f515by Matt Corallo+140−371 file
No security note in commit
Low 30 AI analysisMessage 81 · Strong
LDK Lightning Dev Kitrust-lightning BitcoinCryptographic librariesLightning Network

Merge PR 'Skip Electrum creator transaction downloads' (#4992)

This change stops the Electrum-based transaction sync client from downloading the very transaction that created an output it is watching. Previously, the client could request that transaction from Electrum, even though a transaction can ne…

Avoids unnecessary Electrum transaction.get requests for watched outputsReduces information disclosure to Electrum server about watched outpointsAdds regression test verifying request suppression
c36e50cbby Matt Corallo+142−02 files
No security note in commit
Low 44 AI analysisMessage 81 · Strong
LDK Lightning Dev Kitrust-lightning BitcoinCryptographic librariesLightning Network

Merge PR 'Use preferred sPK of watched txn in electrum, not rand ones' (#4867)

This change improves how the Lightning Dev Kit's Electrum and Esplora transaction-sync clients track watched Bitcoin transactions. Previously, the code ignored the script pubkey (the 'address' associated with a transaction) supplied when r…

Previously ignored `script_pubkey` argument in `register_tx` for transaction watchersElectrum script-history queries previously used an arbitrary transaction output, which could be OP_RETURN and therefore unindexed by some Electrum serversNew logic prefers caller-supplied script pubkey and falls back to non-OP_RETURN outputs
bfe5ca89by tnull+52−243 files
No security note in commit
Low 33 AI analysisMessage 81 · Strong
LDK Lightning Dev Kitrust-lightning BitcoinCryptographic librariesLightning Network

Merge PR 'Serialize transient Event variants; move persist decision into ChannelManager' (#4791)

This commit changes how LDK stores pending event notifications. It adds serialization support for several event types that previously were not fully saved to disk, and introduces a helper method so the code can decide which events are wort…

Data-loss prevention: previously non-round-trippable event variants are now fully serialized, avoiding accidental event loss when users serialize Event queues themselvesState-consistency hardening: ChannelManager now explicitly skips events that describe non-surviving restart state, preventing replay of stale eventsDefensive assertion: debug builds assert that every persisted event round-trips to Some(event), catching serialization mismatches
a0d4632eby Matt Corallo+694−818 files
No security note in commit
Informational 15 AI analysisMessage 81 · Strong
LDK Lightning Dev Kitrust-lightning BitcoinCryptographic librariesLightning Network

Merge PR 'Document that funding signing events can go stale' (#4960)

This commit only adds documentation comments to two source files. It explains that certain funding-signing events can become stale if the underlying negotiation fails, and that callers may see specific harmless errors as a result. No code …

26eecf2dby Matt Corallo+15−02 files
No security note in commit
Informational 15 AI analysisMessage 100 · Strong
LDK Lightning Dev Kitrust-lightning BitcoinCryptographic librariesLightning Network

Drop the honggfuzz version pin from the CI fuzz job

This commit removes a fixed-version pin for the honggfuzz fuzzing tool in a continuous-integration script. The project now uses the current release of honggfuzz instead of an older pinned version. There is no change to the actual Lightning…

4a1635efby auto-pr-bot+1−51 file
No security note in commit
Informational 15 AI analysisMessage 86 · Strong
LDK Lightning Dev Kitrust-lightning BitcoinCryptographic librariesLightning Network

Run the CI fuzz job on the stable toolchain

This commit changes the Rust toolchain used in the continuous integration (CI) fuzzing job from a fixed older version (1.75) to the latest stable release. It is purely a build/test infrastructure change to fix a dependency compatibility is…

21c4ed2bby auto-pr-bot+3−32 files
No security note in commit
Informational 19 AI analysisMessage 91 · Strong
LDK Lightning Dev Kitrust-lightning BitcoinCryptographic librariesLightning Network

Expose the dummy-hop tail constructor publicly

This commit makes a previously internal helper function public so that outside developers can build dummy-hop tails for blinded payment paths without recreating the logic themselves. It is an API usability change, not a fix for a known sec…

No security-relevant behavior change in the diffAPI visibility broadened from crate-public to publicCLTV expiry overflow check already present and unchanged
c5443353by auto-pr-bot+14−71 file
No security note in commit
Moderate 54 AI analysisMessage 100 · Strong
LDK Lightning Dev Kitrust-lightning BitcoinCryptographic librariesLightning Network

Fail commitment sig verification without counterparty params

This change adds a safety check in a Bitcoin Lightning Network library (LDK). Previously, if the software tried to verify a peer's commitment signature before it had learned the peer's channel parameters, it could crash with a panic. Now i…

Defensive check added on peer-driven code path to prevent panicMissing counterparty_parameters could previously cause panic during commitment transaction constructionChannel closure returned instead of panic
de7ecc2fby auto-pr-bot+24−01 file
Vendor flagged security relevance
Informational 15 AI analysisMessage 100 · Strong
LDK Lightning Dev Kitrust-lightning BitcoinCryptographic librariesLightning Network

Clarify the commitment validation failure message

This commit only changes the wording of an error message sent to peers when a commitment transaction fails validation. It replaces the vague phrase 'Failed to validate our commitment' with the clearer 'Received commitment failed validation…

3284a006by auto-pr-bot+11−114 files
No security note in commit
Moderate 61 AI analysisMessage 81 · Strong
LDK Lightning Dev Kitrust-lightning BitcoinCryptographic librariesLightning Network

Merge PR 'Move holder commit sig checks to `InMemorySigner`' (#4885)

This commit moves the checks that validate a counterparty's signatures on the holder's commitment and HTLC transactions out of the general channel code and into the signer module (InMemorySigner). Previously, these signature checks were do…

Moved signature validation from channel state machine into signer moduleAdded new tests that corrupt signatures and verify rejectionChanged error message from 'Invalid commitment tx signature from peer' / 'Invalid funding_created signature from peer' to 'Failed to validate our commitment'
83f5ba55by Matt Corallo+626−31024 files
No security note in commit
Low 42 AI analysisMessage 86 · Strong
LDK Lightning Dev Kitrust-lightning BitcoinCryptographic librariesLightning Network

Merge PR 'Drop stale splice signature on disconnect' (#4954)

This change fixes a Lightning channel splicing bug: when two peers temporarily disconnect during a splice, any half-finished signature the other side already sent is now discarded. Before the fix, that stale signature could be reused after…

State-invalidation bug in multi-step protocol (splice negotiation)Stale cryptographic signature not cleared on disconnectPotential reuse of old commitment state after reconnect
c9a77251by Matt Corallo+22−12 files
No security note in commit
Moderate 58 AI analysisMessage 73 · Adequate
LDK Lightning Dev Kitrust-lightning BitcoinCryptographic librariesLightning Network

Drop stale splice signature on disconnect

This fix prevents a Lightning channel from being accidentally force-closed. During a splice (a way to resize a payment channel), one side's initial signature could be kept in memory after the peers disconnected. If the peers later reconnec…

State inconsistency: in-memory buffered message not cleared on disconnectDuplicate message processing after reconnectionForce-close consequence for active Lightning channel
71405b4bby Wilmer Paulino+22−12 files
Vendor flagged security relevance
Informational 20 AI analysisMessage 81 · Strong
LDK Lightning Dev Kitrust-lightning BitcoinCryptographic librariesLightning Network

Merge PR 'offers: rename matches_invoice_signing_pubkey to key_can_sign_invoice' (#4942)

This commit is a simple rename of a public function from `matches_invoice_signing_pubkey` to `key_can_sign_invoice`, plus matching updates to its documentation, callers, tests, and changelog. No behavior changed. It is not a security fix.

a476cf92by Matt Corallo+13−133 files
No security note in commit
Informational 15 AI analysisMessage 73 · Adequate
LDK Lightning Dev Kitrust-lightning BitcoinCryptographic librariesLightning Network

offers: rename matches_invoice_signing_pubkey to key_can_sign_invoice

This commit is a simple rename of a function and its documentation from matches_invoice_signing_pubkey to key_can_sign_invoice. No logic, behavior, or security properties changed. It is a follow-up code-review naming cleanup.

388187caby Vincenzo Palazzo+13−133 files
No security note in commit
Informational 18 AI analysisMessage 81 · Strong
LDK Lightning Dev Kitrust-lightning BitcoinCryptographic librariesLightning Network

Merge PR 'offers: add Offer::permits_invoice_signed_by' (#4884)

This commit adds a new public helper method, Offer::matches_invoice_signed_by (later renamed matches_invoice_signing_pubkey), that lets callers check whether an invoice signing key belongs to the recipient named by a BOLT 12 offer. It also…

Refactors existing BOLT 12 invoice-signing-pubkey validation into a reusable helperAdds public API to bind an invoice signing key to an offer recipientAdds unit tests for issuer-id vs. path-last-hop matching behavior
016af8f9by Matt Corallo+81−135 files
No security note in commit
Low 29 AI analysisMessage 85 · Strong
LDK Lightning Dev Kitrust-lightning BitcoinCryptographic librariesLightning Network

Support retired TLV fields in object-constructing macros

This commit is a feature enhancement for LDK's internal serialization macros. It allows developers to mark old protocol fields as 'retired' (reserved but no longer used) in more places, so those type numbers cannot be accidentally reused. …

TLV type-number reservation mechanism extended to more macro-generated code pathsPrevents accidental reuse of retired protocol field type numbersAvoids UnknownRequiredFeature decode failures for obsolete even-type fields
6d7c2bdaby Jeffrey Czyz+120−222 files
No security note in commit
Informational 17 AI analysisMessage 91 · Strong
LDK Lightning Dev Kitrust-lightning BitcoinCryptographic librariesLightning Network

Replace splice failure wire tests with a 0.2 downgrade test

This commit is a test-only cleanup in the Lightning Dev Kit (LDK) Rust codebase. It removes low-level byte-level tests for splice failure events and replaces them with a single cross-version test that actually loads a 0.2 node with seriali…

Cross-version serialization compatibility test addedRemoval of byte-level tests that could not detect real 0.2 mismatchesNo production code changes
80f2b44fby auto-pr-bot+95−2663 files
No security note in commit
Low 28 AI analysisMessage 98 · Strong
LDK Lightning Dev Kitrust-lightning BitcoinCryptographic librariesLightning Network

Document duplicate HTLC handling on revoked commitments

This commit only adds a code comment explaining an existing quirk: if a revoked old channel transaction contains two identical-looking payment forwards and the other side claims both, the software may only claim one upstream while letting …

Behavioral quirk in revoked-commitment HTLC resolution documentedDuplicate (payment_hash, amount) HTLCs can map to the same upstream sourcePotential missed upstream preimage claim on second identical HTLC
c5bd8b11by auto-pr-bot+19−01 file
Vendor flagged security relevance
Moderate 60 AI analysisMessage 73 · Adequate
LDK Lightning Dev Kitrust-lightning BitcoinCryptographic librariesLightning Network

Abort active splice RBF when prior candidate confirms

This commit fixes a state-handling bug in Lightning Dev Kit's splicing feature. When a user tries to speed up or replace a pending splice (an 'RBF' attempt) and the older splice transaction unexpectedly gets confirmed on-chain, the softwar…

State-conflict handling between confirmed splice candidate and active RBF negotiationStructured abort propagation through chain-event pathConditional abort based on holder signature progress to avoid unsafe cancellation
7587d2cdby Wilmer Paulino+623−424 files
No security note in commit
Repository ledger

Explore captured commits

Expand any commit for its author, full message, clarity score, changed files, triage signals, analysis, and source link.

Security candidateWrite DiscardFunding contributions as an odd event typeby Jeffrey Czyz · bad9e47b · Aug 21, 2026 · 1 fileMessage 81 · StrongLow 35Details
Commit message · Jeffrey Czyz

Write DiscardFunding contributions as an odd event type

`FundingInfo::Contribution` was added in 0.3, but 0.2 fails to read
unknown `FundingInfo` variants. A `ChannelManager` or `ChannelMonitor`
serialized while an `Event::DiscardFunding` containing one was pending
-- the former whenever serialized during an incomplete splice
negotiation with a local contribution, the latter upon discarding a
negotiated splice with a recorded contribution -- could therefore never
be read by 0.2.

Write such events under a new odd event type, which prior versions
ignore, restoring the ability to downgrade. A downgraded node loses the
event; the next commit compensates for the negotiation-failure case by
including the discarded UTXOs in `Event::SpliceNegotiationFailed`.

Partially addresses #4919.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

81/100 · StrongMessage clarity
✓ Specific, descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Provides detailed explanatory context✓ Links an issue, advisory, or supporting reference
Why it was queued
update trust
AI analysis · Low 35/100

This commit fixes a backward-compatibility bug in how a particular wallet event is saved to disk. A new type of funding contribution introduced in version 0.3 could not be read by version 0.2, which would crash or fail when loading a wallet that had been saved while a 'DiscardFunding' event was pending. The fix writes that specific case under a new, odd-numbered event type that older versions safely ignore, allowing users to downgrade from 0.3 to 0.2 without their wallet becoming unloadable. There is no attacker-controlled exploit here; it is a reliability/downgrade fix.

Security candidateFix SpliceNegotiationFailed TLV collision with 0.2by Jeffrey Czyz · c34a4e77 · Aug 21, 2026 · 3 filesMessage 81 · StrongLow 39Details
Commit message · Jeffrey Czyz

Fix SpliceNegotiationFailed TLV collision with 0.2

`Event::SpliceFailed` was released in 0.2 writing `contributed_inputs`
and `contributed_outputs` at TLV types 11 and 13. When those fields
were removed, the freed types were reused for the new `reason` and
`contribution` fields of the renamed `Event::SpliceNegotiationFailed`.

Consequently, a `ChannelManager` written by 0.2 while such an event was
pending -- the case whenever one is serialized during an incomplete
splice negotiation with a local contribution -- fails to read on 0.3,
as the legacy fields are misparsed as the new ones. Conversely, 0.2
fails to read a `ChannelManager` written by 0.3 while such an event was
pending.

Write `reason` and `contribution` at fresh odd TLV types, restoring the
compatibility behavior documented when the fields were removed; the
legacy types are odd, so unknown-type handling skips them on read. Note
that a `ChannelManager` written by v0.3.0-beta1 while such an event was
pending is no longer readable, as beta1 wrote `reason` and
`contribution` at the colliding types.

Partially addresses #4919; a pending `Event::DiscardFunding` with
`FundingInfo::Contribution` still prevents downgrade to 0.2.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

81/100 · StrongMessage clarity
✓ Specific, descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Provides detailed explanatory context✓ Links an issue, advisory, or supporting reference
Why it was queued
update trust
AI analysis · Low 39/100

This commit fixes a data-format compatibility bug between versions 0.2 and 0.3 of the Lightning Dev Kit. When a pending splice-failure event was saved to disk by one version, the other version could misread it because new fields reused old numeric identifiers (TLV types). The patch assigns fresh identifiers so old and new data no longer collide. It is a backward-compatibility fix, not an exploitable security vulnerability, and it includes tests to confirm old data can now be read correctly.

Security candidateMerge PR 'Defer splice_locked during RBF signing' (#4891)by Matt Corallo · 89c9e5f4 · Aug 20, 2026 · 5 filesMessage 81 · StrongLow 44Details
Commit message · Matt Corallo

Merge PR 'Defer splice_locked during RBF signing' (#4891)

from delay-splice-promotion-inflight-rbf-negotiation into main

Reviewed-on: https://git.rust-bitcoin.org/lightningdevkit/rust-lightning/pulls/4891
Reviewed-by: Matt Corallo <matt@noreply.git.rust-bitcoin.org>

81/100 · StrongMessage clarity
✓ Specific, descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Provides detailed explanatory context✓ Links an issue, advisory, or supporting reference
Why it was queued
signing boundarymerge-commit duplicate discount
AI analysis · Low 44/100

This commit fixes a timing bug in Lightning Dev Kit's splicing code. Previously, a node could prematurely send a 'splice_locked' message and promote an older splice transaction to active while a replacement transaction was still being signed through RBF. The patch defers sending splice_locked until the RBF signing round completes and the channel is no longer quiescent, then releases the lock on a timer tick. This prevents inconsistent channel states between peers and avoids potential fund loss or channel closure from conflicting funding transactions.

Security candidateMerge PR 'Checkpoint deferred ChannelManager with AwaitingSignatures splice' (#4911)by Matt Corallo · a42e29b1 · Aug 20, 2026 · 1 fileMessage 91 · StrongLow 29Details
Commit message · Matt Corallo

Merge PR 'Checkpoint deferred ChannelManager with AwaitingSignatures splice' (#4911)

from fuzz-checkpoint-splice-signing-session into main

Reviewed-on: https://git.rust-bitcoin.org/lightningdevkit/rust-lightning/pulls/4911
Reviewed-by: Matt Corallo <matt@noreply.git.rust-bitcoin.org>

91/100 · StrongMessage clarity
✓ Specific, descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Provides detailed explanatory context✓ Mentions testing or verification✓ Links an issue, advisory, or supporting reference
Why it was queued
signing boundaryfuzzing or regression evidencemerge-commit duplicate discount
AI analysis · Low 29/100

This commit adds a workaround in a fuzz test harness for a known limitation in how Lightning Dev Kit saves its state during a splice operation. When a node is in a 'deferred persistence' test mode and has a splice waiting for signatures, the test now forces a state checkpoint before restarting. Without this, a fuzz test could simulate a restart at a moment where the signing session has not yet been saved, causing the node to disagree with its peer and force-close the channel. The change is in test/fuzz code, not production logic, but it documents a real edge case in production state management.

Security candidateCheckpoint deferred ChannelManager with AwaitingSignatures spliceby Wilmer Paulino · e1c3fec5 · Aug 20, 2026 · 1 fileMessage 83 · StrongLow 33Details
Commit message · Wilmer Paulino

Checkpoint deferred ChannelManager with AwaitingSignatures splice

We don't currently checkpoint our signing session prior to sending
`commitment_signed`. The fuzzer has shown that it's possible that we
commit to a splice candidate and reload with an outdated manager prior
to the signing session existing. If the counterparty commits to the
splice back, and is expecting to resume, we'll end up aborting
erroneously leading to a force close. We defer the real fix for now and
instead prevent the fuzzer from running into this case.

Fixes fuzz payload:

7f0200000000004211a10081bd4a191f1119401f001118100f1810411f00111810101b10401f00111810101810411f00111810101810401f00111fb170b170ff

83/100 · StrongMessage clarity
✓ Specific, descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Provides detailed explanatory context✓ Mentions testing or verification
Why it was queued
signing boundaryfuzzing or regression evidence
AI analysis · Low 33/100

This commit is a temporary workaround in a fuzz-testing harness for the Lightning Dev Kit. It forces a save of the channel manager before restarting a test node when a specific in-progress splice state exists. The underlying issue is that the signing session for a splice isn't checkpointed before sending a commitment message, so if the node restarts at the wrong moment, it can reload stale state and force-close a channel unnecessarily. The commit does not fix the root cause; it only prevents the fuzzer from hitting the case.

AI review queuedtx-sync: parallelize esplora status queriesby Max Fang · 262ebae0 · Aug 20, 2026 · 1 fileMessage 68 · AdequateInformational 21Details
Commit message · Max Fang

tx-sync: parallelize esplora status queries

The esplora sync loop awaited each HTTP query sequentially: one
get_block_status per relevant txid, 3 round trips (merkle block, tx,
block status) per watched transaction, and one get_output_status per
watched output. With many channels this pure latency dominates sync
wall-clock time, particularly during the first sync after a restart.

In async builds, run the per-block, per-transaction, and per-output
queries concurrently via buffer_unordered, bounded at 16 in-flight
requests by default and configurable via with_concurrency.
Confirmed transactions are already sorted by (height, in-block
position) before being fed to the confirmables, so completion order
does not matter. The blocking client variant remains sequential.

Also dedup block status queries by block hash (multiple relevant txids
can share a block), and drop a redundant duplicate-txid check when
iterating watched_transactions: it is a HashSet, so txids are unique.

Note that items are moved into the concurrently-polled futures as owned
values (txids copied, watched outputs cloned). Borrowing them compiles
within this crate but trips rustc's "implementation of FnOnce is not
general enough" false positive in downstream callers that box the
returned sync future.

68/100 · AdequateMessage clarity
✓ Descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Provides detailed explanatory context
Why it was queued
signing or wallet pathsecond-pass: security-sensitive path
AI analysis · Informational 21/100

This commit is a performance improvement, not a security fix. It speeds up how rust-lightning asks an Esplora server about transaction and block status by running many requests at once instead of one at a time. The change also removes a duplicate check and deduplicates repeated block-status lookups. There is no indication in the commit that it fixes a vulnerability or that the old code was unsafe.

Security candidatelightning-payer-proof: flag the uniffi record's untrusted stringsby auto-pr-bot · 71de48ab · Aug 19, 2026 · 1 fileMessage 73 · AdequateLow 30Details
Commit message · auto-pr-bot

lightning-payer-proof: flag the uniffi record's untrusted strings

The uniffi record hands its three free-text fields back as plain
`String`s, copied straight out of the proof with no sanitization, but
only `offer_description` warned about that. `offer_issuer` and
`proof_note` are just as attacker-controlled, so carry the same warning
on both.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

73/100 · AdequateMessage clarity
✓ Specific, descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Provides detailed explanatory context
Why it was queued
explicit security languagedefensive validation
AI analysis · Low 30/100

This commit only adds documentation comments warning developers that two text fields returned by a UniFFI record are untrusted and should be sanitized before display. It does not change any code behavior, add sanitization, or fix an active vulnerability. It is a defensive documentation improvement for a potential injection/display-risk issue.

AI review queuedMerge PR 'Add a BOLT 12 payer proof verification crate' (#4839)by Matt Corallo · 6df1057f · Aug 19, 2026 · 20 filesMessage 91 · StrongInformational 17Details
Commit message · Matt Corallo

Merge PR 'Add a BOLT 12 payer proof verification crate' (#4839)

from lightning-payer-proof into main

Reviewed-on: https://git.rust-bitcoin.org/lightningdevkit/rust-lightning/pulls/4839
Reviewed-by: Matt Corallo <matt@noreply.git.rust-bitcoin.org>

91/100 · StrongMessage clarity
✓ Specific, descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Provides detailed explanatory context✓ Mentions testing or verification✓ Links an issue, advisory, or supporting reference
Why it was queued
defensive validationmerge-commit duplicate discountsecond-pass: unusually broad change
AI analysis · Informational 17/100

This commit adds a brand-new, optional crate called lightning-payer-proof to the rust-lightning workspace. It provides a public library (and separate UniFFI bindings) for verifying BOLT 12 'payer proofs' — cryptographic receipts that a Lightning payment was made. The change is purely additive: it introduces new code, test vectors, CI build entries, and workspace membership. There is no patch to existing logic and nothing in the commit message or diff indicates a security bug was fixed.

AI review queuedMerge PR 'Ban non-dust HTLCs if dust limit would be breached' (#4890)by Matt Corallo · b198733e · Aug 14, 2026 · 2 filesMessage 81 · StrongModerate 57Details
Commit message · Matt Corallo

Merge PR 'Ban non-dust HTLCs if dust limit would be breached' (#4890)

from 2026-08-ban-nondust-htlcs into main

Reviewed-on: https://git.rust-bitcoin.org/lightningdevkit/rust-lightning/pulls/4890
Reviewed-by: Matt Corallo <matt@noreply.git.rust-bitcoin.org>

81/100 · StrongMessage clarity
✓ Specific, descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Provides detailed explanatory context✓ Links an issue, advisory, or supporting reference
Why it was queued
signing or wallet pathmerge-commit duplicate discountsecond-pass: security-sensitive path
AI analysis · Moderate 57/100

This change tightens how Lightning payment limits are calculated when transaction fees are high. Previously, the code could allow a non-dust HTLC (a payment large enough to normally appear on-chain) to be offered even when the combined dust-exposure risk pushed the channel past its safety limit. The patch lowers the allowed outbound amount by one millisatoshi in that edge case so the HTLC is treated as dust and rejected, preventing a situation where a miner-fee spike could make an HTLC uneconomical to claim on-chain. The practical effect is a small, defensive correction to fee-based channel safety logic.

AI review queuedFix outdated PersistenceNotifierGuard commentby elnosh · af3d07d1 · Aug 12, 2026 · 1 fileMessage 35 · OpaqueInformational 15Details
Commit message · elnosh

Fix outdated PersistenceNotifierGuard comment

35/100 · OpaqueMessage clarity
✓ Descriptive subject! No meaningful explanatory body
Why it was queued
second-pass: opaque commit message
AI analysis · Informational 15/100

This commit only updates an internal code comment to match the current API names. No code behavior changes, no security relevance.

AI review queuedCorrect 0.2.5 and 0.1.12 CHANGELOG entriesby Matt Corallo · 8322fc4e · Aug 11, 2026 · 1 fileMessage 73 · AdequateInformational 15Details
Commit message · Matt Corallo

Correct 0.2.5 and 0.1.12 CHANGELOG entries

* The response panic issue is when accepting *onion messages*
which merit a response, not HTLCs,
* 0.1 was not vulnerable to the panic-on-reorg issue Kyle reported
as it did not contain the new package merging logic.

73/100 · AdequateMessage clarity
✓ Descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Provides detailed explanatory context✓ Names security-relevant behavior explicitly
Why it was queued
documentation-only discountsecond-pass: broader security terminology
AI analysis · Informational 15/100

This commit only edits the project's CHANGELOG text. It corrects earlier release notes: one panic issue actually involved 'onion messages' (not HTLCs), and an older 0.1 release was not actually vulnerable to a reorg-related panic because it lacked the relevant code. No code behavior changes.

AI review queuedAdd 0.1.12 release notesby Matt Corallo · 9bc0dc50 · Aug 11, 2026 · 1 fileMessage 38 · OpaqueHigh 78Details
Commit message · Matt Corallo

Add 0.1.12 release notes

38/100 · OpaqueMessage clarity
✓ Subject identifies a change✓ Names a concrete action or component! No meaningful explanatory body
Why it was queued
documentation-only discountsecond-pass: opaque commit message
AI analysis · High 78/100

This commit adds release notes for rust-lightning version 0.1.12, describing several security fixes. The most serious is an on-chain funds-theft vulnerability for nodes that forward Lightning payments through channels opened by untrusted peers. Other fixes address denial-of-service crashes, including cases involving invalid onion message reply paths, oversized protocol messages, reorgs during on-chain HTLC claims, and peer flooding of channel-open requests. The release notes credit Project Loupe and Kyle W. Santiago for reporting the security issues.

Security candidateMerge PR 'Fix warnings on `nightly`' (#4864)by tankyleo · 9606d2fa · Aug 11, 2026 · 31 filesMessage 76 · AdequateInformational 15Details
Commit message · tankyleo

Merge PR 'Fix warnings on `nightly`' (#4864)

from 2026-08-fix-nightly-warnings into main

Reviewed-on: https://git.rust-bitcoin.org/lightningdevkit/rust-lightning/pulls/4864
Reviewed-by: tankyleo <tankyleo@noreply.git.rust-bitcoin.org>

76/100 · AdequateMessage clarity
✓ Descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Provides detailed explanatory context✓ Links an issue, advisory, or supporting reference
Why it was queued
cryptography-sensitive pathsigning or wallet pathmerge-commit duplicate discount
AI analysis · Informational 15/100

This commit is a routine cleanup that fixes Rust compiler warnings on the nightly toolchain. It replaces deprecated ways of writing maximum integer values (like `u64::max_value()` and `std::usize::MAX`) with the modern equivalents (`u64::MAX`, `usize::MAX`), adds a missing semicolon in a log statement, and updates related comments. These changes do not alter program behavior or fix any security issue.

Lower-priorityMerge PR 'Only fetch TXIDs instead of entire block during gossip verification' (#4846)by Matt Corallo · ebe7a447 · Aug 5, 2026 · 5 filesMessage 91 · StrongLow 32Details
Commit message · Matt Corallo

Merge PR 'Only fetch TXIDs instead of entire block during gossip verification' (#4846)

from gossip-verify-rpc into main

Reviewed-on: https://git.rust-bitcoin.org/lightningdevkit/rust-lightning/pulls/4846
Reviewed-by: Matt Corallo <matt@noreply.git.rust-bitcoin.org>

91/100 · StrongMessage clarity
✓ Specific, descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Provides detailed explanatory context✓ Mentions testing or verification✓ Links an issue, advisory, or supporting reference
Why it was queued
defensive validationmerge-commit duplicate discount
AI analysis · Low 32/100

This commit changes how the Lightning Dev Kit's block-sync module verifies Lightning network gossip announcements. Instead of downloading entire Bitcoin blocks (which can be large), it now downloads only the list of transaction IDs for a block and then separately fetches the specific unspent transaction output it needs. This is primarily a performance and bandwidth optimization, not a security fix. The change also updates the public API of the UtxoSource trait, requiring custom implementations to add new methods.

Lower-priorityMerge PR 'Allow filtered block rescans at the current tip' (#4847)by Matt Corallo · 54ddbd0b · Aug 5, 2026 · 6 filesMessage 81 · StrongLow 35Details
Commit message · Matt Corallo

Merge PR 'Allow filtered block rescans at the current tip' (#4847)

from 2026-08-block-replay into main

Reviewed-on: https://git.rust-bitcoin.org/lightningdevkit/rust-lightning/pulls/4847
Reviewed-by: jkczyz <jkczyz@noreply.git.rust-bitcoin.org>

81/100 · StrongMessage clarity
✓ Specific, descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Provides detailed explanatory context✓ Links an issue, advisory, or supporting reference
Why it was queued
merge-commit duplicate discount
AI analysis · Low 35/100

This commit changes how the Lightning Dev Kit (LDK) node software handles receiving the same block twice through its filtered-block interface. Previously, calling filtered_block_connected with the current tip again would trigger an assertion failure and crash the node. The patch allows this 'rescan' case, treating it as a replay rather than a new block, so the node no longer panics. This is a robustness improvement for clients that use compact block filters or other filtered-block delivery paths, but it is not a cryptographic or funds-theft vulnerability.

Lower-priorityAdd test framework coverage of `Listen` block connection replaysby Matt Corallo · bf6ad23e · Aug 5, 2026 · 2 filesMessage 83 · StrongInformational 15Details
Commit message · Matt Corallo

Add test framework coverage of `Listen` block connection replays

While this should generally be equivalent to receiving a block
duplicatively via the `best_block_updated` +
`transactions_confirmed` methods, its good to add explicit test
coverage for the newly-supported (but always documented...)
connection mode.

83/100 · StrongMessage clarity
✓ Specific, descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Provides detailed explanatory context✓ Mentions testing or verification
AI analysis · Informational 15/100

This commit only adds a new test mode to the project's internal testing framework. It lets developers simulate a specific way blocks are delivered to the Lightning node (a 'replay' through the Listen interface) so that behavior is covered by automated tests. There is no change to production code, no bug fix, and no security-relevant behavior change.

Lower-priorityUpdate functional test block connection to detect block replaysby Matt Corallo · 477facb4 · Aug 5, 2026 · 3 filesMessage 83 · StrongInformational 15Details
Commit message · Matt Corallo

Update functional test block connection to detect block replays

In cases where we replay a block, the functional test framework
shouldn't consider it a new block and re-add it to the tracked
blockchain in `Node`s.

83/100 · StrongMessage clarity
✓ Specific, descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Provides detailed explanatory context✓ Mentions testing or verification
AI analysis · Informational 15/100

This commit changes only internal test helper code in the Lightning Dev Kit repository. It makes the functional test framework smarter about 'block replays'—situations where the same block is fed to a test node more than once—so the fake blockchain ledger inside tests does not incorrectly treat the replay as a new block. There is no change to production code, network behavior, or real user funds. The commit message and diff do not describe any security vulnerability.

Lower-priorityCorrect HTLC confusion on unrevoked counterparty commitment txsby Matt Corallo · f06a08a6 · Aug 4, 2026 · 2 filesMessage 73 · AdequateModerate 66Details
Commit message · Matt Corallo

Correct HTLC confusion on unrevoked counterparty commitment txs

When we see an HTLC on an unrevoked counterparty commitment
transaction we check if it has a corresponding `HTLCSource` when
deciding whether it is likely from a revoked counterparty
commitment transaction. This is insufficient, however, and can
result in us assuming that an HTLC is on a revoked counterparty
commitment (and thus is safe to fail back based on a loose HTLC
match) rather than on a live one.

Here we correct this check and also expand several debug assertions
that validated the detection of the claim style against the HTLC
type into full-blown assertions. If we end up hitting these,
they're almost certainly an indication that something has gone
horribly wrong and either keys have leaked or the node software is
confused and continuing would be unsafe.

73/100 · AdequateMessage clarity
✓ Specific, descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Provides detailed explanatory context
Why it was queued
defensive validation
AI analysis · Moderate 66/100

This patch fixes a bug in the Lightning Dev Kit where the software could confuse HTLCs (payment contracts) on live, unrevoked counterparty commitment transactions with ones from old, revoked transactions. Previously, it relied only on whether a matching HTLCSource existed, which was not enough. This could lead the node to incorrectly treat a live HTLC as revoked and fail it back, potentially causing loss of funds or channel disruption. The patch also turns several debug-only consistency checks into full assertions that will crash the node if violated, because such violations indicate a serious security failure.

Security candidateReturn `Err`s` instead of panicking on oversized messagesby Matt Corallo · 08f12bc7 · Aug 4, 2026 · 3 filesMessage 85 · StrongLow 47Details
Commit message · Matt Corallo

Return `Err`s` instead of panicking on oversized messages

While this code should remain unreachable as it likely indicates
we're going to end up force-closing a channel due to being unable
to communicate with a peer, we shouldn't bring down the whole
process for it if we can avoid it.

Instead, at least return an `Err` so we can figure out what to do
with it in `PeerManager`.

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>

85/100 · StrongMessage clarity
✓ Specific, descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Provides detailed explanatory context✓ Explains rationale or failure mode
Why it was queued
cryptography-sensitive path
AI analysis · Low 47/100

This commit changes how the Lightning networking code handles oversized encrypted messages. Previously, certain conditions would cause the program to crash with a panic. Now the code returns errors instead, which is a defensive improvement. However, one important call site still uses `.expect("TODO: Handled in the next commit")`, meaning the crash risk is not fully removed there yet. The commit is a partial patch toward making the node more resilient against denial-of-service from malformed or oversized peer traffic.

Lower-priorityAvoid panicking when attempting to send an oversized messageby Matt Corallo · c5fdc3bf · Aug 4, 2026 · 1 fileMessage 85 · StrongModerate 62Details
Commit message · Matt Corallo

Avoid panicking when attempting to send an oversized message

While this code should remain unreachable as it likely indicates
we're going to end up force-closing a channel due to being unable
to communicate with a peer, we shouldn't bring down the whole
process for it if we can avoid it.

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>

85/100 · StrongMessage clarity
✓ Specific, descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Provides detailed explanatory context✓ Explains rationale or failure mode
AI analysis · Moderate 62/100

This commit fixes a crash bug in the Lightning Dev Kit's peer message handling. Previously, if a message grew too large to be sent over the encrypted peer connection, the code would panic (abruptly terminate the whole program). The patch makes the message-sending code return an error instead, and updates callers to either drop the message or disconnect the affected peer gracefully. It is a defensive hardening change that prevents a single oversized message from bringing down a node.

AI review queuedAvoid oversized relayed failure messagesby Matt Corallo · 6b1dfb1a · Aug 4, 2026 · 1 fileMessage 78 · AdequateHigh 74Details
Commit message · Matt Corallo

Avoid oversized relayed failure messages

A downstream peer could send a maximum-sized update_fail_htlc
without attribution data. Adding attribution data while relaying the
failure made the message exceed the Noise framing limit and panic
during encryption.

Drop the attribution data again when adding it would push the relayed
failure over the wire limit, while preserving attribution for packets
that fit. The message length is derived from serialized_length on the
message and on the attribution data itself rather than from hardcoded
field sizes, which also lets us replace a stale assertion on the
maximum failure data length. Add a regression test for relaying a
maximum-sized failure and correct the existing size test to include
the message type.

Reported by Project Loupe.

Co-Authored-By: Elias Rohrer <dev@tnull.de>
Co-Authored-By: HAL 9000

78/100 · AdequateMessage clarity
✓ Descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Provides detailed explanatory context✓ Mentions testing or verification
Why it was queued
fuzzing or regression evidencesecond-pass: broader security terminology
AI analysis · High 74/100

This patch fixes a crash bug in the Lightning Dev Kit's handling of HTLC failure messages. A downstream peer could send a maximally-sized failure message without attribution data. When the node added its own attribution data while relaying the failure, the resulting message became too large to fit within the Lightning Network's wire protocol limit, causing a panic during encryption. The fix drops the attribution data when adding it would exceed the limit, and adds a regression test.

AI review queuedReject attempts to advance one-hop blinded forward pathsby Matt Corallo · 969a40cf · Aug 4, 2026 · 4 filesMessage 83 · StrongModerate 64Details
Commit message · Matt Corallo

Reject attempts to advance one-hop blinded forward paths

A malicious reply path can contain a single decryptable forward hop.
Advancing that path removed its only hop, causing onion construction to
panic when a handler attempted to respond.

Reject paths with fewer than two hops before attempting to advance
them. The regression test exercises the untrusted response path and
verifies that it returns an error without panicking.

Reported by Project Loupe.

Test written by: Elias Rohrer <dev@tnull.de>, which was
Co-Authored-By: HAL 9000

83/100 · StrongMessage clarity
✓ Specific, descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Provides detailed explanatory context✓ Mentions testing or verification
Why it was queued
fuzzing or regression evidencesecond-pass: broader security terminology
AI analysis · Moderate 64/100

This commit fixes a denial-of-service bug in rust-lightning where a maliciously crafted one-hop blinded reply path could cause the node to panic when it tried to respond. The fix rejects paths with too few hops before advancing them, and adds a regression test to confirm no panic occurs.

Lower-prioritylightning-types: replace Zl/Zp separators in `PrintableString`by Vincenzo Palazzo · 75defa9c · Aug 4, 2026 · 3 filesMessage 96 · StrongHigh 72Details
Commit message · Vincenzo Palazzo

lightning-types: replace Zl/Zp separators in `PrintableString`

`PrintableString` replaces control (`Cc`), "other" (`C*`, including
`Cf`), and unassigned codepoints with U+FFFD, but U+2028 LINE SEPARATOR
(`Zl`) and U+2029 PARAGRAPH SEPARATOR (`Zp`) passed through verbatim:
`char::is_control` is `Cc`-only and the generated tables in
`unicode.rs` only cover the top-level `C` categories. Many terminals
and log viewers render U+2028/U+2029 as hard line breaks, so a
peer-controlled string (node alias, BOLT 12 description/issuer/
payer_note, `peer_msg`) could inject forged log lines that appear
sanitised.

Extend `contrib/gen_unicode_general_category.py` to also emit a
`Zl`/`Zp` separator predicate and regenerate `unicode.rs` from the
same UnicodeData 17.0.0 the existing tables were built from, then filter
on the new predicate in `PrintableString`. `Zs` is deliberately
excluded as it contains U+0020 SPACE. Add a regression test mirroring
the existing bidi-override test.

Found by a Loupe scan, tracked by the Bitcoin Security Council:
https://github.com/bitcoin-security-council/findings/pull/180

Co-Authored-By: goose (AI agent) <noreply@localhost>

96/100 · StrongMessage clarity
✓ Specific, descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Provides detailed explanatory context✓ Mentions testing or verification✓ Links an issue, advisory, or supporting reference✓ Names security-relevant behavior explicitly
Why it was queued
fuzzing or regression evidence
AI analysis · High 72/100

This commit fixes a log-forgery risk in a Rust Lightning library helper called PrintableString. That helper is meant to make untrusted text safe to print by replacing dangerous characters with a placeholder. It already caught most control characters, but it missed two special Unicode line-break characters (U+2028 and U+2029). Because many terminals and log viewers treat those as real line breaks, an attacker could smuggle them inside an otherwise 'sanitised' string to fake new log lines, potentially misleading an operator. The patch adds a check for those two characters and includes a regression test.

Lower-priorityApply the unfunded channel peer limit to all unaccepted channelsby Matt Corallo · 56a4ee43 · Aug 4, 2026 · 2 filesMessage 73 · AdequateModerate 69Details
Commit message · Matt Corallo

Apply the unfunded channel peer limit to all unaccepted channels

If a peer floods us with channel requests, we previously failed to
enforce `MAX_UNFUNDED_CHANNEL_PEERS` as we considered the peer to
have some channels once it has more than one request pending.

Instead, we have to make sure we reject such channels by looking
at pending channels as well.

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>

73/100 · AdequateMessage clarity
✓ Specific, descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Provides detailed explanatory context
AI analysis · Moderate 69/100

This commit fixes a rate-limiting bug in the Lightning Dev Kit (LDK) that let a single peer bypass the cap on how many different peers can have unfunded (not-yet-funded) channels open. Previously, if a peer sent multiple channel requests quickly before any were accepted, LDK counted the peer as already 'having channels' and stopped enforcing the peer limit. The fix checks whether the peer actually has any funded channels, not just any channel requests pending, before allowing a new inbound channel.

AI review queuedAllow filtered block rescans at the current tipby Elias Rohrer · 686f9860 · Aug 4, 2026 · 3 filesMessage 88 · StrongModerate 60Details
Commit message · Elias Rohrer

Allow filtered block rescans at the current tip

A valid same-block replay through Listen could panic OutputSweeper and
ChannelManager because both required every filtered_block_connected call
to advance the chain.

Treat callbacks matching the current tip as rescans, process their
additional transaction data, and skip the duplicate best-block update
while retaining chain-order checks for new blocks.

Fixes #3920

Reported by Project Loupe

Co-Authored-By: HAL 9000

88/100 · StrongMessage clarity
✓ Descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Provides detailed explanatory context✓ Explains rationale or failure mode✓ Links an issue, advisory, or supporting reference
Why it was queued
second-pass: broader security terminology
AI analysis · Moderate 60/100

This commit fixes a bug where replaying the current blockchain block through a normal listener callback could crash two core Lightning components (ChannelManager and OutputSweeper) with a panic. The fix recognizes a same-block replay as a 'rescan,' processes any extra transaction data it carries, and avoids updating the already-current best block. It is a denial-of-service/crash bug triggered by valid, chain-ordered behavior from upstream block sources, not by malformed data.