BC
← All projectsBitcoin Core

Bitcoin Core

The Bitcoin network's reference node and wallet implementation.

BitcoinSupply chainNormal
Repository coverage

2889 commits in the local evidence base

Every captured commit receives deterministic security triage and a separate communication-quality score. Security candidates and broader second-pass signals receive full-patch Ollama analysis.

253security candidates604second-pass queue2093AI analyses
207commits · 30 days
502commits · 60 days
1528commits · 180 days
2883commits · 365 days
Backfill bands
Aug 5 → Feb 61351 seen45 candidatesComplete
Feb 6 → Jun 61033 seen63 candidatesComplete
Jun 6 → Jul 6281 seen11 candidatesComplete
Jul 6 → Aug 5207 seen5 candidatesComplete
Commit communication

Does the history explain itself?

Message quality measures whether a commit identifies its scope, purpose, rationale, testing, and supporting references. It does not change the security-severity score.

70/100 average clarity
927Strong · 80–100
1188Adequate · 60–79
686Thin · 40–59
88Opaque · 0–39
6security candidates with opaque commit messaging
Read the scoring rubric →
Developer activity

Who is changing the project?

Public Git author strings; identities are not independently verified.

DeveloperCommitsCandidatesAnalyzedHigh riskMessage avg.
Antoine Poinsot22418170
Ava Chow15750146064
MarcoFalke40921274074
Lőrinc17721135081
fanquake22719146057
Hennadii Stepanov20914152063
rkrux57956074
Sjors Provoost89871074
Sebastian Falbesoner33727073
David Gumberg55652072
Pieter Wuille95556066
Hodlinator66545076
Analysis record

Published AI watches

Last scanned 16 minutes ago

Informational 15 AI analysisMessage 93 · Strong
BC Bitcoin CoreBitcoin Core BitcoinSupply chain

Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#35895: refactor: Enable clang-tidy rule to reject anon namespace in header

This is a code cleanup change that turns on a static-analysis rule to prevent a specific C++ coding pattern (anonymous namespaces in header files) and updates two headers to comply. It does not change how Bitcoin Core behaves at runtime an…

No security-relevant code changeNo memory safety, cryptography, consensus, or network changesTooling-only refactor (clang-tidy configuration)
c4fbd3c7by merge-script+9−123 files
No security note in commit
Informational 15 AI analysisMessage 100 · Strong
BC Bitcoin CoreBitcoin Core BitcoinSupply chain

Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#35630: test: Add importdescriptors rpc error test coverage

This commit only adds new test cases to Bitcoin Core's functional test suite. It does not change any production wallet, node, or RPC code. The tests verify that the importdescriptors RPC reports errors in the right order, rejects bad times…

465196d0by merge-script+77−11 file
No security note in commit
Informational 15 AI analysisMessage 81 · Strong
BC Bitcoin CoreBitcoin Core BitcoinSupply chain

Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#35180: coins: group private cache helpers

This change is purely a code cleanup: it moves two internal helper functions of a Bitcoin Core cache class into the private section of the class and removes a duplicate 'private:' label. There is no change to what the code does, no bug fix…

c940fd75by merge-script+13−141 file
No security note in commit
Low 29 AI analysisMessage 81 · Strong
BC Bitcoin CoreBitcoin Core BitcoinSupply chain

Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#35582: rpc: reject null for optional parameters

This Bitcoin Core change tightens how three RPC commands (scantxoutset, scanblocks, deriveaddresses) handle the value null when it is passed for optional parameters. Previously, explicitly passing null could be treated differently from sim…

RPC parameter validation changeNull value handling changeAddition of explicit error checks for missing required contextual parameters
3db96eb5by merge-script+18−75 files
No security note in commit
Informational 15 AI analysisMessage 57 · Thin
BC Bitcoin CoreBitcoin Core BitcoinSupply chain

refactor: Enable misc-definitions-in-headers

This commit is a code cleanup: it turns on a clang-tidy style check called 'misc-definitions-in-headers' and suppresses that check around a large inline implementation block in a benchmark header. There is no change to Bitcoin's runtime be…

fa93132dby MarcoFalke+3−02 files
No security note in commit
Informational 15 AI analysisMessage 85 · Strong
BC Bitcoin CoreBitcoin Core BitcoinSupply chain

refactor: Enable clang-tidy rule to reject anon namespace in header

This commit only changes a linting configuration file for the project's code style checker. It enables a rule that prevents anonymous namespaces from being used in header files, which is a code-quality and build-hygiene practice. There is …

No security-relevant signals in the diff or commit message.Change is purely a static-analysis/linting configuration update.
fa5ca877by MarcoFalke+2−11 file
No security note in commit
Informational 15 AI analysisMessage 62 · Adequate
BC Bitcoin CoreBitcoin Core BitcoinSupply chain

refactor: Use C++20 std::identity over IntIdentity

This commit is a straightforward code cleanup: it replaces a small custom helper named IntIdentity with the standard C++20 std::identity from the <functional> header. The behavior of the ConvertBits function is unchanged; only the implemen…

fafe5042by MarcoFalke+4−111 file
No security note in commit
Informational 15 AI analysisMessage 87 · Strong
BC Bitcoin CoreBitcoin Core BitcoinSupply chain

test: test the result order of a multiple import request is correct

This commit only adds a new automated test to Bitcoin Core. It checks that when a user asks the wallet to import multiple descriptors at once, the list of results comes back in the same order as the original request, including any error me…

3ac8b806by Pol Espinasa+40−01 file
No security note in commit
Informational 15 AI analysisMessage 87 · Strong
BC Bitcoin CoreBitcoin Core BitcoinSupply chain

test: test invalid or missing timestamp throws importdescriptors

This commit only adds new automated tests for the Bitcoin Core wallet's importdescriptors RPC. It checks that the command correctly rejects requests with a missing or invalid timestamp. No production wallet code is changed, so this cannot …

No changes to consensus, networking, wallet logic, or cryptographyOnly functional test code is modifiedAdded assertions are for expected error handling paths
e4732bf0by Pol Espinasa+28−11 file
No security note in commit
Informational 15 AI analysisMessage 80 · Strong
BC Bitcoin CoreBitcoin Core BitcoinSupply chain

refactor: Remove unused #include in common/system

This is a minor code cleanup that removes one unused header file include and swaps another for a more specific one. It does not change any program behavior or fix any security issue.

fa7304f3by MarcoFalke+1−22 files
No security note in commit
Informational 15 AI analysisMessage 50 · Thin
BC Bitcoin CoreBitcoin Core BitcoinSupply chain

iwyu: Fix warnings in `src/consensus` and treat them as errors

This commit is a routine code cleanup: it adjusts which C++ header files are included in several consensus-related source files and turns on a stricter compiler hygiene check (Include What You Use, or IWYU) for the src/consensus directory.…

13b53f8bby Hennadii Stepanov+42−79 files
No security note in commit
Informational 15 AI analysisMessage 55 · Thin
BC Bitcoin CoreBitcoin Core BitcoinSupply chain

fuzz: don't connman.ReceiveMsgFrom oversized msg

This is a small fix to a Bitcoin Core fuzz test (an automated internal testing harness), not to the live network code. The fuzzer was sometimes creating fake P2P messages larger than the real protocol allows and passing them into a test he…

Test-only fuzz harness hardeningOversized message guard added before ReceiveMsgFrom() in fuzz targetNo change to production P2P message acceptance logic
bb19f1daby Greg Sanders+5−01 file
No security note in commit
Informational 15 AI analysisMessage 97 · Strong
BC Bitcoin CoreBitcoin Core BitcoinSupply chain

ci: Temporarily remove riscv32 config from GHA matrix

This commit simply removes one failing test configuration (RISC-V 32-bit bare metal) from the project's GitHub Actions CI matrix because it was failing. It is a routine CI maintenance change with no security implications.

fa06ea42by MarcoFalke+0−61 file
No security note in commit
Low 47 AI analysisMessage 90 · Strong
BC Bitcoin CoreBitcoin Core BitcoinSupply chain

ci: verify cross-build SDK archives

This change adds checksum verification to the build system's downloads of Apple, FreeBSD, NetBSD, and OpenBSD software development kits (SDKs). Before this patch, those SDK archives were downloaded at build time and extracted without confi…

Adds cryptographic digest verification for downloaded SDK archivesRemoves unchecked extraction of remote SDK archives in CIHardens CI supply chain for macOS/BSD cross-builds
873550beby Lőrinc+25−126 files
Vendor flagged security relevance
Informational 15 AI analysisMessage 80 · Strong
BC Bitcoin CoreBitcoin Core BitcoinSupply chain

ci: update NetBSD cross-build SDK

This is a routine maintenance update to Bitcoin Core's continuous integration (CI) system. It changes the version number of the NetBSD operating system used for cross-compilation testing from a release candidate (11.0_RC6) to the final rel…

2c87337eby Lőrinc+1−11 file
No security note in commit
Informational 15 AI analysisMessage 72 · Adequate
BC Bitcoin CoreBitcoin Core BitcoinSupply chain

test: require `TryGetTotalRam()` detection

This commit only changes a test file and build configuration. It removes the option to skip a test when the system cannot detect total RAM, and instead requires the RAM detection to succeed. It does not change any production wallet, networ…

6a2de55aby Lőrinc+3−112 files
No security note in commit
Informational 15 AI analysisMessage 68 · Adequate
BC Bitcoin CoreBitcoin Core BitcoinSupply chain

scripted-diff: use `MIN_DBCACHE_BYTES`

This commit is a simple automated rename of a constant from MIN_DB_CACHE to MIN_DBCACHE_BYTES across five files. The value stays the same (4 MiB), and no behavior changes. It is a code-cleanup/refactoring change with no security relevance.

7cfa21d6by Lőrinc+5−55 files
No security note in commit
Informational 20 AI analysisMessage 68 · Adequate
BC Bitcoin CoreBitcoin Core BitcoinSupply chain

kernel: allow setting chainstate `dbcache`

This commit adds a new public API knob to the Bitcoin Core 'libbitcoinkernel' library so that programs using the kernel can choose how much memory to use for the chainstate database cache. It also enforces minimum and maximum size limits. …

New configurable cache-size API with explicit min/max validationReplaces hard-coded DEFAULT_KERNEL_CACHE with caller-supplied valueAdds unit tests for out-of-range rejection and 32-bit upper-bound rejection
8bd9f460by Lőrinc+41−14 files
No security note in commit
Informational 15 AI analysisMessage 68 · Adequate
BC Bitcoin CoreBitcoin Core BitcoinSupply chain

kernel, node: colocate dbcache bounds

This commit is a small code cleanup: it moves two constants that define the minimum and maximum size of the database cache (dbcache) into a shared kernel header so that both the node and kernel code use the same limits. There is no change …

8aa21e11by Lőrinc+7−74 files
No security note in commit
Informational 15 AI analysisMessage 62 · Adequate
BC Bitcoin CoreBitcoin Core BitcoinSupply chain

node, qt: inline `DEFAULT_DB_CACHE`

This is a small code cleanup change in Bitcoin Core. It removes a misleading alias named DEFAULT_DB_CACHE and replaces it with the underlying name DEFAULT_KERNEL_CACHE in a few places. The behavior of the program is unchanged; only the nam…

cd086c16by Lőrinc+5−74 files
No security note in commit
Repository ledger

Explore captured commits

Expand any commit for its author, full message, clarity score, changed files, triage signals, analysis, and source link.

Lower-priorityclarify blockfilterindex cache allocation rationaleby Sebastian van Staa · 5a2e3592 · May 4, 2026 · 1 fileMessage 50 · ThinInformational 15Details
Commit message · Sebastian van Staa

clarify blockfilterindex cache allocation rationale

50/100 · ThinMessage clarity
✓ Specific, descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component! No meaningful explanatory body
AI analysis · Informational 15/100

This commit only changes a code comment explaining why the blockfilterindex gets 5% of the total cache budget. It adds a note that a typical two-week offline gap produces a working set of about 200 kB, which fits comfortably within that 5% allocation. No code behavior, cache sizes, or logic are modified.

Lower-priorityci: unconfine seccomp for i686 no IPCby Lőrinc · 11c9ef92 · May 3, 2026 · 1 fileMessage 100 · StrongInformational 20Details
Commit message · Lőrinc

ci: unconfine seccomp for i686 no IPC

Docker 29.4.2 blocks `socketcall(2)` in the default seccomp profile:
https://docs.docker.com/engine/release-notes/29/#2942
https://github.com/moby/profiles/releases/tag/seccomp%2Fv0.2.2
https://github.com/moby/moby/pull/52501

That affects the `i686, no IPC` job because it runs 32-bit Linux test binaries inside Docker.

Add Docker's documented `--security-opt seccomp=unconfined` workaround to this job's `CI_CONTAINER_CAP` - the hook `ci/test/02_run_container.py` already appends to `docker run`.

This restores socket availability for the 32-bit test binaries throughout the job:
https://docs.docker.com/engine/security/seccomp/#run-without-the-default-seccomp-profile

100/100 · StrongMessage clarity
✓ Descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Uses a recognizable type or scope✓ Provides detailed explanatory context✓ Explains rationale or failure mode✓ Mentions testing or verification✓ Links an issue, advisory, or supporting reference✓ Names security-relevant behavior explicitly
AI analysis · Informational 20/100

This change loosens a security sandbox only for one 32-bit Linux continuous-integration test job. Docker's newer default profile was blocking an old 32-bit system call used for sockets, causing the CI job to fail. The patch tells Docker not to apply its default seccomp filter to that container so the tests can run. It does not change Bitcoin Core code that end users run, and it does not appear to be a fix for a vulnerability in Bitcoin itself.

Security candidatescripted-diff: rename ABEF_SAVE/CDGH_SAVE to ABCD_SAVE/EFGH_SAVE in SHA-256 ARM intrinsicsby jrakibi · 86718e45 · May 3, 2026 · 1 fileMessage 91 · StrongInformational 15Details
Commit message · jrakibi

scripted-diff: rename ABEF_SAVE/CDGH_SAVE to ABCD_SAVE/EFGH_SAVE in SHA-256 ARM intrinsics

ARM SHA256 intrinsics take state in natural order: ABCD + EFGH
(hash_abcd/hash_efgh). The code already uses that layout, only the
ABEF_SAVE/CDGH_SAVE names were wrong. Rename to ABCD_SAVE/EFGH_SAVE.
No logic change.

Docs: https://developer.arm.com/architectures/instruction-sets/intrinsics/#f:@navigationhierarchiesinstructiongroup=[Cryptography,SHA256]
Fix in original C code (Jeffrey): https://github.com/noloader/SHA-Intrinsics/pull/14

-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
perl -pi -e 's/\bABEF_SAVE([AB])?\b/ABCD_SAVE$1/g' src/crypto/sha256_arm_shani.cpp
perl -pi -e 's/\bCDGH_SAVE([AB])?\b/EFGH_SAVE$1/g' src/crypto/sha256_arm_shani.cpp
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-

91/100 · StrongMessage clarity
✓ Specific, descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Provides detailed explanatory context✓ Mentions testing or verification✓ Links an issue, advisory, or supporting reference
Why it was queued
cryptography-sensitive path
AI analysis · Informational 15/100

This is a pure variable-name cleanup in Bitcoin Core's ARM SHA-256 code. The old names (ABEF_SAVE/CDGH_SAVE) were misleading labels; the new names (ABCD_SAVE/EFGH_SAVE) match how ARM's SHA-256 instructions actually order the hash state. No instructions, values, or behavior change.

Lower-prioritykernel: Expose btck_transaction_check consensus functionby w0xlt · bfbf1a7e · May 1, 2026 · 4 filesMessage 83 · StrongInformational 19Details
Commit message · w0xlt

kernel: Expose btck_transaction_check consensus function

Add btck_transaction_check() to the libbitcoinkernel C API, exposing
context-free transaction consensus validation (consensus/tx_check.h).

Introduces btck_TxValidationState with introspection and lifecycle
functions. btck_TxValidationResult is exposed for compatibility with
existing validation-state APIs, though btck_transaction_check currently
reaches only UNSET and CONSENSUS.

Includes C++ wrapper and test coverage for btck_transaction_check using
test vectors from tx_valid.json / tx_invalid.json.

83/100 · StrongMessage clarity
✓ Specific, descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Provides detailed explanatory context✓ Mentions testing or verification
Why it was queued
fuzzing or regression evidence
AI analysis · Informational 19/100

This commit adds a new public function to Bitcoin Core's libbitcoinkernel library that lets outside programs ask the kernel to perform basic, context-free checks on a transaction (for example, whether it has valid outputs and no duplicate inputs). It is purely an API addition: it exposes an existing internal validation routine through a C interface and adds tests. There is no bug fix, no change to consensus rules, and no indication of a security vulnerability.

Lower-priorityutil, iwyu: Add missed headerby Hennadii Stepanov · d28179ba · Apr 30, 2026 · 1 fileMessage 45 · ThinInformational 15Details
Commit message · Hennadii Stepanov

util, iwyu: Add missed header

45/100 · ThinMessage clarity
✓ Descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component! No meaningful explanatory body
AI analysis · Informational 15/100

This is a minor code hygiene change that adds a missing C++ standard library header (<concepts>) to a utility header file. It does not change program behavior, fix a vulnerability, or introduce any security-relevant functionality. It is an 'include what you use' (IWYU) cleanup.

Lower-prioritynet: make CConnman::m_nodes_mutex non-recursiveby Vasil Dimov · 11713c9f · Apr 30, 2026 · 2 filesMessage 76 · AdequateInformational 23Details
Commit message · Vasil Dimov

net: make CConnman::m_nodes_mutex non-recursive

This change includes `s/RecursiveMutex/Mutex/` and a pile of
annotations to keep the compiler happy after the type change.

Partially resolves: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/19303

76/100 · AdequateMessage clarity
✓ Descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Provides detailed explanatory context✓ Links an issue, advisory, or supporting reference
AI analysis · Informational 23/100

This commit changes a single internal lock in Bitcoin Core's networking code from a recursive mutex (one that lets the same thread lock it multiple times safely) to a plain non-recursive mutex. It also adds many compile-time and runtime checks to make sure no code path tries to lock it twice. The change is defensive hardening: it makes the locking rules stricter so that accidental deadlocks or re-entrancy bugs are caught earlier, but it does not by itself fix a known, exploitable vulnerability.

Lower-prioritynet: drop the only recursive usage of CConnman::m_nodes_mutexby Vasil Dimov · aec4fa2d · Apr 30, 2026 · 1 fileMessage 73 · AdequateInformational 18Details
Commit message · Vasil Dimov

net: drop the only recursive usage of CConnman::m_nodes_mutex

The only recursive usage of `CConnman::m_nodes_mutex` is from
`PeerManagerImpl::MaybeSetPeerAsAnnouncingHeaderAndIDs()` which uses
nested calls to `CConnman::ForNode()` to trim the size of
`lNodesAnnouncingHeaderAndIDs` to `<= 3`. This need not be nested, so
take it out.

Before:
```
fornode(newnode)
if (size >= 3)
fornode(front) handle removal of front
pop front
push back newnode
```

After:
```
fornode(newnode)
push back newnode
if (size > 3)
fornode(front) handle removal of front
pop front
```

`lNodesAnnouncingHeaderAndIDs` is protected by `cs_main` which is locked
during the entire operation.

73/100 · AdequateMessage clarity
✓ Specific, descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Provides detailed explanatory context
AI analysis · Informational 18/100

This is a small internal cleanup in Bitcoin Core's network code. It removes the only case where a particular network lock (m_nodes_mutex) was acquired twice in a nested/recursive way. The change reorders the logic so the list of high-bandwidth compact-block peers is updated without nested lock calls. There is no direct security vulnerability being fixed; it is a code-quality and future-proofing change that makes the locking simpler and easier to reason about.

Lower-prioritybuild: allow ipc fuzz buildsby Enoch Azariah · 8a739a55 · Apr 30, 2026 · 1 fileMessage 90 · StrongInformational 16Details
Commit message · Enoch Azariah

build: allow ipc fuzz builds

Do not force ENABLE_IPC=OFF when BUILD_FOR_FUZZING is enabled.

The libfuzzer preset is expected to build the full fuzz surface, and the
ipc target should not require an extra opt-in flag to be compiled.

IPC already depends on the normal top-level ENABLE_IPC option and will fail
naturally when its Capn Proto dependencies are unavailable. Keeping the
fuzz-only override would silently skip IPC coverage in standard fuzz builds.

90/100 · StrongMessage clarity
✓ Descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Uses a recognizable type or scope✓ Provides detailed explanatory context✓ Mentions testing or verification
Why it was queued
fuzzing or regression evidencedocumentation-only discount
AI analysis · Informational 16/100

This is a one-line build-system change for Bitcoin Core. Previously, when developers built the fuzzing test suite, the code automatically disabled a feature called IPC (inter-process communication). This change removes that automatic disable so the IPC fuzz target gets compiled along with the rest of the fuzzing surface. It is a build/test-coverage fix, not a fix for a runtime vulnerability in the Bitcoin node software itself.

Lower-prioritydoc: Add release note for disallowing some wallet path namesby David Gumberg · eed7af66 · Apr 29, 2026 · 1 fileMessage 50 · ThinInformational 15Details
Commit message · David Gumberg

doc: Add release note for disallowing some wallet path names

50/100 · ThinMessage clarity
✓ Specific, descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component! No meaningful explanatory body
Why it was queued
documentation-only discount
AI analysis · Informational 15/100

This commit only adds a release note document. It describes a previously made change that blocks certain unusual wallet names (like paths containing '..' or '.', or just '/'). There is no code change here, and the note itself is informational documentation.

AI review queuedwallettool: Use GetWalletPath to determine the wallet pathby Ava Chow · 3d7f0e4e · Apr 29, 2026 · 3 filesMessage 73 · AdequateLow 27Details
Commit message · Ava Chow

wallettool: Use GetWalletPath to determine the wallet path

Instead of computing the path separately, use GetWalletPath to use the
behavior and error checking of the typical wallet path computation.

73/100 · AdequateMessage clarity
✓ Specific, descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Provides detailed explanatory context
Why it was queued
signing or wallet pathsecond-pass: security-sensitive path
AI analysis · Low 27/100

This change refactors how the standalone bitcoin-wallet tool figures out where a wallet file lives. Previously it computed the path itself; now it calls the same internal helper (GetWalletPath) that the main wallet code uses, which includes checks for invalid wallet names. The likely effect is to prevent mistakes or misuse involving odd wallet names/paths, rather than to fix an active remote-exploitable bug.

AI review queuedwallet, rpc: Disallow import of unused() if key already existsby Ava Chow · 35bbee63 · Apr 29, 2026 · 2 filesMessage 50 · ThinLow 33Details
Commit message · Ava Chow

wallet, rpc: Disallow import of unused() if key already exists

50/100 · ThinMessage clarity
✓ Specific, descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component! No meaningful explanatory body
Why it was queued
signing or wallet pathsecond-pass: security-sensitive path
AI analysis · Low 33/100

This Bitcoin Core change prevents users from importing a special 'unused()' wallet descriptor if the private key it refers to is already present in the wallet. The patch adds a check during descriptor import and a test to confirm the new behavior. The commit message does not describe this as a security fix, and no external security references are provided, so its security relevance is uncertain. It appears to be a defensive correctness fix that could prevent confusion or wallet-state inconsistencies rather than a fix for an active exploit.

Lower-prioritydoc: Release note for addhdkeyby Ava Chow · a39cc16b · Apr 29, 2026 · 1 fileMessage 45 · ThinInformational 15Details
Commit message · Ava Chow

doc: Release note for addhdkey

45/100 · ThinMessage clarity
✓ Descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component! No meaningful explanatory body
Why it was queued
documentation-only discount
AI analysis · Informational 15/100

This commit only adds a release note describing a new wallet RPC called addhdkey. It contains no code changes and no security-related content.

AI review queuedwallet, rpc: Disallow importing unused() to wallets without privkeysby Ava Chow · 89b9a01b · Apr 29, 2026 · 2 filesMessage 50 · ThinLow 34Details
Commit message · Ava Chow

wallet, rpc: Disallow importing unused() to wallets without privkeys

50/100 · ThinMessage clarity
✓ Specific, descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component! No meaningful explanatory body
Why it was queued
signing or wallet pathsecond-pass: security-sensitive path
AI analysis · Low 34/100

This change blocks users from importing a special type of Bitcoin wallet descriptor called unused() into wallets that have private keys disabled. Such wallets are watch-only: they can see transactions but cannot spend. The unused() descriptor is meant to reserve a key for future use. Allowing it in a no-private-key wallet could have led to confusion or situations where the wallet believes it controls funds it cannot actually spend, but the patch is a simple guard with no demonstrated exploit.

AI review queuedwallet: Add addhdkey RPCby Ava Chow · f3f8bcbd · Apr 29, 2026 · 2 filesMessage 28 · OpaqueInformational 23Details
Commit message · Ava Chow

wallet: Add addhdkey RPC

28/100 · OpaqueMessage clarity
✓ Subject identifies a change! No meaningful explanatory body
Why it was queued
signing or wallet pathsecond-pass: opaque commit messagesecond-pass: security-sensitive path
AI analysis · Informational 23/100

This commit adds a new wallet RPC command called addhdkey that lets users import a BIP32 extended private key (xprv) into a Bitcoin Core wallet, or generate a fresh random one. It is a feature addition, not a bug fix. The code checks that the wallet stores private keys, requires the wallet to be unlocked, rejects plain xpubs, and refuses duplicate keys. There is no indication in the commit that this fixes a security vulnerability.

Security candidatepsbt: Return std::optional from PrecomputePSBTDataby Ava Chow · c568624f · Apr 29, 2026 · 8 filesMessage 50 · ThinLow 34Details
Commit message · Ava Chow

psbt: Return std::optional from PrecomputePSBTData

50/100 · ThinMessage clarity
✓ Specific, descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component! No meaningful explanatory body
Why it was queued
signing boundarysigning or wallet path
AI analysis · Low 34/100

This commit changes a Bitcoin Core internal helper function so that it can now report failure when a PSBT (Partially Signed Bitcoin Transaction) is internally inconsistent. Previously, the helper would build transaction precomputation data without checking whether the underlying unsigned transaction could actually be constructed. Now it returns an optional value that callers must check, and they reject or abort the operation if the transaction cannot be valid. This is a defensive hardening change that prevents the code from continuing with malformed PSBTs.

Security candidateReplace PSBT::GetInputUTXO with PSBTInput::GetUTXOby Ava Chow · 092de4f1 · Apr 29, 2026 · 4 filesMessage 65 · AdequateInformational 15Details
Commit message · Ava Chow

Replace PSBT::GetInputUTXO with PSBTInput::GetUTXO

Now that PSBTInput's track their own prevouts, there's no need for a
PSBT global function to fetch input specific data.

65/100 · AdequateMessage clarity
✓ Specific, descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Provides an explanatory body
Why it was queued
signing boundarysigning or wallet path
AI analysis · Informational 15/100

This commit is a straightforward internal code cleanup in Bitcoin Core. It moves a helper function that looks up the previous transaction output (UTXO) for a PSBT input from the whole-transaction object (PartiallySignedTransaction) into the input object itself (PSBTInput). The behavior is unchanged; only the code organization is simplified.

Security candidateImplement PSBTv2 in decodepsbtby Ava Chow · dcc9a3c8 · Apr 29, 2026 · 1 fileMessage 35 · OpaqueInformational 18Details
Commit message · Ava Chow

Implement PSBTv2 in decodepsbt

35/100 · OpaqueMessage clarity
✓ Descriptive subject! No meaningful explanatory body! Opaque security-relevant change
Why it was queued
signing boundarysigning or wallet path
AI analysis · Informational 18/100

This commit updates the Bitcoin Core 'decodepsbt' RPC command so it can display the newer PSBT version 2 format. It only changes what information is shown to the user; it does not change how transactions are validated, signed, or broadcast. There is no indication this is a security fix.

Security candidateImplement PSBTv2 AddInput and AddOutputby Ava Chow · 93e339e2 · Apr 29, 2026 · 2 filesMessage 45 · ThinInformational 20Details
Commit message · Ava Chow

Implement PSBTv2 AddInput and AddOutput

45/100 · ThinMessage clarity
✓ Descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component! No meaningful explanatory body
Why it was queued
signing boundarysigning or wallet path
AI analysis · Informational 20/100

This commit finishes implementing the 'AddInput' and 'AddOutput' methods for PSBT version 2 in Bitcoin Core. PSBTs are files used to collaboratively build or sign Bitcoin transactions offline. Previously, adding inputs/outputs to a PSBTv2 would silently fail (return false). The change now properly checks version compatibility, respects the 'modifiable' flags that say whether inputs/outputs may be added, and handles time-lock consistency when new inputs are appended. It is a feature-completion patch with defensive checks, not a fix for an active vulnerability.

Security candidateImplement PSBTv2 fields de/serby Ava Chow · 925161ea · Apr 29, 2026 · 2 filesMessage 45 · ThinLow 28Details
Commit message · Ava Chow

Implement PSBTv2 fields de/ser

45/100 · ThinMessage clarity
✓ Descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component! No meaningful explanatory body
Why it was queued
signing boundarysigning or wallet path
AI analysis · Low 28/100

This commit adds support for a new version of Partially Signed Bitcoin Transactions (PSBTv2) in Bitcoin Core. It introduces serialization and deserialization code for new PSBTv2 fields, including transaction version, input/output counts, modifiable flags, per-input previous outpoints and locktimes, and per-output amounts and scripts. The commit also adds validation rules to reject malformed or version-inconsistent PSBT data. There is no indication in the commit message or diff that this is a security fix; it appears to be a feature implementation.

Security candidateImplement PSBTv2 field mergingby Ava Chow · ab38c301 · Apr 29, 2026 · 2 filesMessage 35 · OpaqueLow 28Details
Commit message · Ava Chow

Implement PSBTv2 field merging

35/100 · OpaqueMessage clarity
✓ Descriptive subject! No meaningful explanatory body! Opaque security-relevant change
Why it was queued
signing boundarysigning or wallet path
AI analysis · Low 28/100

This commit updates how Bitcoin Core combines two Partially Signed Bitcoin Transactions (PSBTs). It adds checks to prevent merging PSBTs of different versions, propagates failure if any input or output cannot be merged, and copies new PSBTv2-only fields such as sequence numbers, locktimes, and modifiable flags. The change is a correctness and robustness improvement rather than a clear security fix.

Security candidateAdd psbt_version to PSBT RPCs and default to v2by Ava Chow · bcc1dca7 · Apr 29, 2026 · 12 filesMessage 68 · AdequateInformational 24Details
Commit message · Ava Chow

Add psbt_version to PSBT RPCs and default to v2

walletcreatefundedpsbt, createpsbt, converttopsbt, and psbtbumpfee take
a psbt_version argument to set the version of the PSBT that they
produce. The default psbt_version is 2.

68/100 · AdequateMessage clarity
✓ Descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Provides detailed explanatory context
Why it was queued
signing boundarysigning or wallet path
AI analysis · Informational 24/100

This commit updates Bitcoin Core's Partially Signed Bitcoin Transaction (PSBT) RPC commands so they can produce the newer PSBT version 2 format, and makes version 2 the default. It is a feature and compatibility change, not a fix for an active security vulnerability. The code validates that only versions 0 or 2 can be requested, and updates tests to match the new output structure. There is no indication in the commit that this resolves a disclosed security issue.

Security candidatedoc: Release notes for psbtv2by Ava Chow · 1660c182 · Apr 29, 2026 · 1 fileMessage 45 · ThinInformational 15Details
Commit message · Ava Chow

doc: Release notes for psbtv2

45/100 · ThinMessage clarity
✓ Descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component! No meaningful explanatory body
Why it was queued
signing boundarydocumentation-only discount
AI analysis · Informational 15/100

This commit only adds release notes documentation. It describes a planned change where several Bitcoin RPC commands will default to creating a newer PSBT format (version 2) and gain an optional version argument. There is no code change, no bug fix, and no security issue in this commit itself.

Security candidatetest: Tests for PSBT AddInput and AddOutputby Ava Chow · 5bd0579c · Apr 29, 2026 · 1 fileMessage 67 · AdequateInformational 15Details
Commit message · Ava Chow

test: Tests for PSBT AddInput and AddOutput

67/100 · AdequateMessage clarity
✓ Descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Uses a recognizable type or scope✓ Mentions testing or verification! No meaningful explanatory body
Why it was queued
signing boundarysigning or wallet path
AI analysis · Informational 15/100

This commit only adds new automated tests for existing PSBT (Partially Signed Bitcoin Transaction) helper functions called AddInput and AddOutput. It does not change any production wallet, consensus, or networking code. The tests verify that the functions correctly reject mismatched PSBT versions, duplicate inputs, inputs that violate timelock rules, and additions when the transaction is marked as non-modifiable. There is no indication this commit fixes a security bug or introduces a vulnerability.

AI review queuedtests: Add test vectors from BIP 370by Ava Chow · 0bc1c2e5 · Apr 29, 2026 · 1 fileMessage 55 · ThinInformational 15Details
Commit message · Ava Chow

tests: Add test vectors from BIP 370

55/100 · ThinMessage clarity
✓ Descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Mentions testing or verification! No meaningful explanatory body
Why it was queued
fuzzing or regression evidencesigning or wallet pathsecond-pass: security-sensitive path
AI analysis · Informational 15/100

This commit only adds new test data (sample PSBT strings) to a JSON file used by Bitcoin Core's automated tests. It does not change any production code, wallet logic, or network behavior. There is no security issue here.

Security candidatefuzz: Enforce additional version invariants in PSBT fuzzerby Antoine Poinsot · 470e52a5 · Apr 29, 2026 · 3 filesMessage 60 · AdequateInformational 17Details
Commit message · Antoine Poinsot

fuzz: Enforce additional version invariants in PSBT fuzzer

60/100 · AdequateMessage clarity
✓ Specific, descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Mentions testing or verification! No meaningful explanatory body
Why it was queued
signing boundaryfuzzing or regression evidencesigning or wallet path
AI analysis · Informational 17/100

This commit only changes test/fuzzing code and adds equality operators to internal data structures so the fuzzer can check round-trip behavior of PSBT (Partially Signed Bitcoin Transaction) data. It does not change production transaction handling, consensus rules, or network code. There is no indication it fixes an exploitable vulnerability.