Commit message · Rusty Russellpytest: work around pay flakiness.
pay sometimes ignores exclusions. WONTFIX.
```
with pytest.raises(RpcError, match=r'is not reachable directly and all routehints were unusable.'):
> l1.rpc.pay(inv, exclude=[scid12])
tests/test_pay.py:5279:
...
elif "error" in resp:
> raise RpcError(method, payload, resp['error'])
E pyln.client.lightning.RpcError: RPC call failed: method: pay, payload: {'bolt11': 'lnbcrt1230n1p54mma3sp5x7uerjgyg7ws6fnzdwxc7pgpj6j25uhpqp5uvx3fk8dkcqm37m2spp5k02racjc9knux958u5rgtva24jfvxtr5w3t53pfeavn3thmyny0qdq8v3jhxccxqyjw5qcqp9rzjqgkjyd3q5dv6gllh77kygly9c3kfy0d9xwyjyxsq2nq3c83u5vw4jqqqvuqqqqgqqqqqqqqpqqqqqzsqqc9qxpqysgqcmv875mmzcjl8mwxxndy9an6p870ffpdxdtypmgf5gzsydnt2d68n4kjph0rcprye6tfz0ex0c5clgj3zwm8jgd5vs0fdv7hf7dqr8cqdrg3gf', 'exclude': ['103x2x0/1']}, error: {'code': 210, 'message': 'Ran out of routes to try after 6 attempts: see `paystatus`', 'attempts': [{'status': 'failed', 'failreason': 'No path found', 'partid': 0, 'amount_msat': 123000}, {'status': 'pending', 'failreason': 'No path found', 'partid': 1, 'amount_msat': 123000, 'parent_partid': 0}, {'status': 'failed', 'failreason': 'No path found', 'partid': 2, 'amount_msat': 57006, 'parent_partid': 1}, {'status': 'failed', 'failreason': 'No path found', 'partid': 4, 'amount_msat': 57006, 'parent_partid': 2}, {'status': 'failed', 'failreason': 'No path found', 'partid': 3, 'amount_msat': 65994, 'parent_partid': 1}, {'status': 'failed', 'failreason': 'No path found', 'partid': 5, 'amount_msat': 65994, 'parent_partid': 3}]}
```
The logs show that it doesn't exclude the routehint early: in successful runs we get "After filtering routehints we're left with 0 usable hints". Perhaps this is something to do with the timing of our own notifications?
```
2026-01-07T05:51:10.7902502Z lightningd-1 2026-01-07T05:31:29.706Z DEBUG plugin-pay: cmd -c:pay#64/cln:pay#121 partid 0: Received getchaininfo blockcount=108, headercount=108
2026-01-07T05:51:10.7903334Z lightningd-1 2026-01-07T05:31:29.715Z DEBUG plugin-pay: cmd -c:pay#64/cln:pay#121 partid 0: waitblockheight reports syncheight=108
2026-01-07T05:51:10.7904256Z lightningd-1 2026-01-07T05:31:29.734Z DEBUG plugin-pay: cmd -c:pay#64/cln:pay#121 partid 0: Updated a channel hint for 103x2x0/1: enabled true, estimated capacity 978718000msat
2026-01-07T05:51:10.7905355Z lightningd-1 2026-01-07T05:31:29.734Z DEBUG plugin-pay: cmd -c:pay#64/cln:pay#121 partid 0: Updated a channel hint for 7269357x11669990x33910/1: enabled false, estimated capacity UNKNOWN
2026-01-07T05:51:10.7906580Z lightningd-1 2026-01-07T05:31:29.735Z DEBUG plugin-pay: cmd -c:pay#64/cln:pay#121 partid 0: Updated a channel hint for 103x2x0/1: enabled false, estimated capacity UNKNOWN
2026-01-07T05:51:10.7907665Z lightningd-1 2026-01-07T05:31:29.735Z INFO plugin-pay: cmd -c:pay#64/cln:pay#121 partid 0: Payment fee constraint 615msat is below exemption threshold, allowing a maximum fee of 5000msat
2026-01-07T05:51:10.7908845Z lightningd-1 2026-01-07T05:31:29.752Z DEBUG plugin-pay: Received a channel_hint {.scid = 103x2x0/1, .enabled = 1, .estimate = 978718000msat, .capacity = 1000000000msat }
2026-01-07T05:51:10.7909710Z lightningd-1 2026-01-07T05:31:29.754Z INFO plugin-pay: cmd -c:pay#64/cln:pay#121 partid 0: Filtering out 1 routehints
2026-01-07T05:51:10.7910544Z lightningd-1 2026-01-07T05:31:29.779Z DEBUG plugin-pay: cmd -c:pay#64/cln:pay#121 partid 0: Checking hint {.scid=103x2x0/1, .enabled=1, .estimate=978718000msat}
2026-01-07T05:51:10.7911470Z lightningd-1 2026-01-07T05:31:29.780Z DEBUG plugin-pay: cmd -c:pay#64/cln:pay#121 partid 0: After filtering routehints we're left with 1 usable hints
2026-01-07T05:51:10.7912385Z lightningd-1 2026-01-07T05:31:29.780Z DEBUG plugin-pay: cmd -c:pay#64/cln:pay#121 partid 0: Checking hint {.scid=103x2x0/1, .enabled=1, .estimate=978718000msat}
2026-01-07T05:51:10.7913471Z lightningd-1 2026-01-07T05:31:29.780Z DEBUG plugin-pay: cmd -c:pay#64/cln:pay#121 partid 0: Using routehint 022d223620a359a47ff7f7ac447c85c46c923da53389221a0054c11c1e3ca31d59 (103x1x0) cltv_delta=6
```
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
86/100 · StrongMessage clarity
✓ Descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Provides detailed explanatory context✓ Mentions testing or verification✓ Links an issue, advisory, or supporting reference
Why it was queuedsecond-pass: broader security terminology
AI analysis · Informational 12/100This commit only adds a test-flakiness workaround. It marks an existing test as flaky so the test suite will retry it if it fails. The underlying behavior being tested—a payment command sometimes ignoring an excluded route—was already known and labeled WONTFIX by the project. No production code was changed, and there is no indication this is treated as a security issue.