What changed, and why it matters
This is a one-line correction in a test file. The test was checking that a 'passphrase' setting was NOT included in parsed QR-code settings, but the intended behavior is that it SHOULD be included. The change fixes the test assertion to match the actual expected behavior. It does not change any production code and has no direct security impact on users.
No action required. This is a test-only correction and does not affect runtime security.
Security signals we found
No strong security signals were identified.
Evidence from the diff
In tests/test_settings.py, the assertion assert 'passphrase' not in settings_update_dict was changed to assert 'passphrase' in settings_update_dict. This aligns the unit test with the correct parsing behavior of Settings.parse_settingsqr(). No application logic was modified.
Changed components
tests/test_settings.pyInspect captured patch +1 / −1
diff --git a/tests/test_settings.py b/tests/test_settings.py
index 24aef76..aed45b3 100644
--- a/tests/test_settings.py
+++ b/tests/test_settings.py
@@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ class TestSettings(BaseTest):
config_name, settings_update_dict = Settings.parse_settingsqr(settingsqr_data)
assert "favorite_food" not in settings_update_dict
- assert "passphrase" not in settings_update_dict
+ assert "passphrase" in settings_update_dict
# Accepts update with no Exceptions
self.settings.update(new_settings=settings_update_dict)
Why this scored 15/100
Community notes
Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.
The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.