What changed, and why it matters
This commit only rewrites an inline code comment to describe the same back-button behavior more clearly. No actual code logic, function calls, or data handling changed.
No action needed; the change is cosmetic.
Security signals we found
No strong security signals were identified.
Evidence from the diff
The diff is a pure comment edit in src/seedsigner/views/seed_views.py. The executable code (the if/return block) is identical before and after. The comment now says the first-word back-button cancels mnemonic entry and returns to the routing view, while a later-word back-button returns to the previous word. This is a documentation/comment-only change.
Changed components
src/seedsigner/views/seed_views.pyInspect captured patch +4 / −4
diff --git a/src/seedsigner/views/seed_views.py b/src/seedsigner/views/seed_views.py
index 53370f0..cb2032e 100644
--- a/src/seedsigner/views/seed_views.py
+++ b/src/seedsigner/views/seed_views.py
@@ -226,10 +226,10 @@ class SeedMnemonicEntryView(View):
)
if ret == RET_CODE__BACK_BUTTON:
- # RET_CODE__BACK_BUTTON can happen in two ways here:
- # 1. Backing out of the very first word completely aborts the mnemonic entry.
- # 2. Backing out of a subsequent word just returns to the previous word.
- # In both cases we return to BackStackView, but for case #1 we must also discard.
+ # This handles two possible scenarios:
+ # 1. Backing out of the first word cancels the mnemonic entry process;
+ return to whichever `View` routed us here initially.
+ # 2. Backing out of the current word returns to the previous word.
if self.cur_word_index == 0:
self.controller.storage.discard_pending_mnemonic()
return Destination(BackStackView)
Why this scored 15/100
Community notes
Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.
The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.