AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Informational 15 Bitcoin

Drop the duplicate p2sh branch in _parse_outputs

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by kdmukai

78/100 · Adequate
Drop the duplicate p2sh branch in _parse_outputs

The change-detection block tested for a p2sh policy twice and built the
same script both times: a standalone if ahead of the policy chain, and
an elif inside it. For a p2sh policy neither p2wsh nor p2sh-p2wsh
matches, so control always reached the elif and reassigned an identical
script.p2sh over the first one, from the same redeem_script.

Removing the standalone if leaves a single if/elif chain covering every
policy type, and keeps the comment recording that this branch also
carries pre-segwit multisig (m/45').

Parse output is unchanged. Verified with the full test suite and by
diffing the complete parser state -- policy, amounts, destinations,
change_data, op_return_data -- across 112 scenarios: all seven wallet
script types against all seven recipient types, as spend-with-change,
full spend, self-transfer, and multi-recipient.
✓ Descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Provides detailed explanatory context✓ Mentions testing or verification
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit removes a duplicated code branch that did the exact same thing twice in a row. The behavior of the program is unchanged; it is a minor cleanup with no security effect.

Recommended action

No action needed; this is a non-functional refactor.

Security signals we found

No strong security signals were identified.

Risk score

Why this scored 15/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 0/30
Exploitability 0/25
Stealth signal 0/15
Affected reach 0/15
Confidence 10/10
Evidence quality 5/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.