AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Informational 15 Bitcoin

Document SpliceNegotiationFailed contribution / DiscardFunding overlap

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by Jeffrey Czyz

85/100 · Strong
Document SpliceNegotiationFailed contribution / DiscardFunding overlap

The contribution returned in Event::SpliceNegotiationFailed may include
inputs and outputs already committed to a prior negotiated (but not yet
locked) splice transaction. Those overlapping items are intentionally
omitted from the preceding Event::DiscardFunding to avoid prompting the
user to reclaim UTXOs that are still in use elsewhere. The relationship
was documented on the internal SpliceFundingFailed fields but lost when
they were made private; surface it on the public event field doc.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
✓ Specific, descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Provides detailed explanatory context✓ Explains rationale or failure mode
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit only adds documentation comments to a public Rust enum field. It explains that when a splice negotiation fails, the returned contribution may still include inputs and outputs that are also part of an earlier, not-yet-locked splice transaction, and that those overlapping items are deliberately left out of a previous DiscardFunding event. There is no code behavior change, no bug fix, and no security patch.

Recommended action

No security action needed. Treat as a normal documentation-only commit.

Security signals we found

No strong security signals were identified.

Risk score

Why this scored 15/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 0/30
Exploitability 0/25
Stealth signal 0/15
Affected reach 0/15
Confidence 10/10
Evidence quality 5/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.