AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Informational 17 Bitcoin

fee_policy: use FEERATE_PRECISION for .. precision

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by Sander van Grieken

50/100 · Thin
fee_policy: use FEERATE_PRECISION for .. precision
✓ Specific, descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component! No meaningful explanatory body
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This is a tiny code cleanup in Electrum's fee-estimation logic. It replaces a hard-coded number (100) with a named constant (FEERATE_PRECISION) when rounding Bitcoin transaction fee rates. The math stays the same because the constant value is 2, so 10**2 equals 100. There is no obvious security issue here; it is a maintainability/refactoring change.

Recommended action

No security action required. Treat as normal code-quality review.

Security signals we found

01

No security-relevant behavior change observed in the diff.

02

Change is a constant-for-literal substitution in a rounding expression.

03

No input validation, cryptographic, authorization, or network changes present.

Risk score

Why this scored 17/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 2/30
Exploitability 1/25
Stealth signal 1/15
Affected reach 3/15
Confidence 7/10
Evidence quality 3/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.