AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Informational 15 Bitcoin

ci: tests: move away from tox, just use pytest directly

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by SomberNight

100/100 · Strong
ci: tests: move away from tox, just use pytest directly

- it was originally added in https://github.com/spesmilo/electrum/pull/1334,
with the goal of simplifying running the tests on local dev machines.
However this usage is not documented anywhere, and AFAIK regular contributors
don't use it either.
- tox just adds another layer of abstraction that is not that useful IMO
- I want more control over which electrum-deps are installed, which tox is
(in this case) unhelpfully abstracting away
✓ Specific, descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Uses a recognizable type or scope✓ Provides detailed explanatory context✓ Mentions testing or verification✓ Links an issue, advisory, or supporting reference
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit is a routine cleanup of the project's automated testing setup. It removes the 'tox' tool and runs tests directly with pytest. There is no change to the Electrum wallet application itself, no bug fix, and no security-related change.

Recommended action

No security action needed. This is an infrastructure-only change.

Security signals we found

No strong security signals were identified.

Risk score

Why this scored 15/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 0/30
Exploitability 0/25
Stealth signal 0/15
Affected reach 0/15
Confidence 10/10
Evidence quality 5/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.