AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Low 34 Bitcoin

wallet.get_tx_fee_warning: fix rounding error for sub-1 sat/vbyte fees

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by SomberNight

73/100 · Adequate
wallet.get_tx_fee_warning: fix rounding error for sub-1 sat/vbyte fees

```
>>> Decimal("0.1") < 100/1000
True
```

ref https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5554840.msg65694417#msg65694417
✓ Specific, descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Provides an explanatory body✓ Links an issue, advisory, or supporting reference
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This is a one-line bug fix in Electrum's fee warning logic. The app compares the user's chosen transaction fee rate against the network's minimum relay fee. Previously, because of how Python handles decimal versus floating-point numbers, very low fee rates (below 1 satoshi per virtual byte) could be compared incorrectly, potentially causing the warning not to appear when it should. The fix forces the relay fee to be treated as a precise Decimal so the comparison works correctly. The practical effect is mainly to ensure users get warned about fees that are too low to be relayed.

Recommended action

Apply the patch. It is a safe, minimal correctness fix. No immediate incident response is warranted, but users on unfixed versions may occasionally create transactions with fees too low to propagate without receiving the expected warning.

Security signals we found

01

Incorrect numeric comparison in fee validation

02

Potential UI warning bypass for low-fee transactions

03

User-facing transaction reliability issue

Risk score

Why this scored 34/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 5/30
Exploitability 5/25
Stealth signal 5/15
Affected reach 10/15
Confidence 6/10
Evidence quality 3/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.