tests: unittest QETransactionListModel date format
What the developer wrote
Authored by f321x
tests: unittest QETransactionListModel date format
adds unittests for the date formatting and categorization in
QETransactionListModel
What changed, and why it matters
This commit only adds new automated tests for how transaction dates are displayed and grouped in Electrum's mobile/QML user interface. It does not change any production code, fix a bug, or alter program behavior. There is no security relevance.
No action needed. This is a test-only change with no security implications.
Security signals we found
No strong security signals were identified.
Evidence from the diff
The diff creates tests/test_qml_qetransactionlistmodel.py with unit tests for QETransactionListModel.get_section_by_timestamp and QETransactionListModel.format_date_by_section. It verifies date bucketing (today/yesterday/lastweek/lastmonth/older) and string formatting using mocked datetime values. No application logic is modified.
Changed components
tests/test_qml_qetransactionlistmodel.pyInspect captured patch +71 / −0
diff --git a/tests/test_qml_qetransactionlistmodel.py b/tests/test_qml_qetransactionlistmodel.py
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..7c2b8af
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/test_qml_qetransactionlistmodel.py
@@ -0,0 +1,71 @@
+from datetime import datetime
+from unittest.mock import patch
+
+from electrum.gui.qml.qetransactionlistmodel import QETransactionListModel
+
+from . import ElectrumTestCase
+
+
+class TestQETransactionListModel(ElectrumTestCase):
+
+ def test_get_section_by_timestamp(self):
+ f = QETransactionListModel.get_section_by_timestamp
+
+ mock_today = datetime(2023, 6, 15, 0, 0, 0, 0)
+ with patch('electrum.gui.qml.qetransactionlistmodel.datetime') as mock_dt:
+ mock_dt.today.return_value = mock_today
+ mock_dt.fromtimestamp = datetime.fromtimestamp
+
+ today_ts = datetime(2023, 6, 15, 10, 30, 0).timestamp()
+ self.assertEqual(f(today_ts), 'today')
+
+ today_edge_ts = datetime(2023, 6, 15, 0, 0, 1).timestamp()
+ self.assertEqual(f(today_edge_ts), 'today')
+
+ yesterday_ts = datetime(2023, 6, 14, 15, 0, 0).timestamp()
+ self.assertEqual(f(yesterday_ts), 'yesterday')
+
+ yesterday_edge_ts = datetime(2023, 6, 13, 23, 59, 59).timestamp()
+ self.assertEqual(f(yesterday_edge_ts), 'lastweek')
+
+ lastweek_ts = datetime(2023, 6, 12, 12, 0, 0).timestamp()
+ self.assertEqual(f(lastweek_ts), 'lastweek')
+
+ lastweek_boundary_ts = datetime(2023, 6, 8, 12, 0, 0).timestamp()
+ self.assertEqual(f(lastweek_boundary_ts), 'lastweek')
+
+ lastmonth_ts = datetime(2023, 6, 5, 9, 0, 0).timestamp()
+ self.assertEqual(f(lastmonth_ts), 'lastmonth')
+
+ lastmonth_boundary_ts = datetime(2023, 5, 15, 8, 0, 0).timestamp()
+ self.assertEqual(f(lastmonth_boundary_ts), 'lastmonth')
+
+ older_ts = datetime(2023, 5, 14, 10, 0, 0).timestamp()
+ self.assertEqual(f(older_ts), 'older')
+
+ much_older_ts = datetime(2022, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0).timestamp()
+ self.assertEqual(f(much_older_ts), 'older')
+
+ def test_format_date_by_section(self):
+ f = QETransactionListModel.format_date_by_section
+
+ test_date = datetime(2023, 6, 15, 14, 30, 45)
+
+ result = f('today', test_date)
+ self.assertEqual(result, '14:30')
+
+ result = f('yesterday', test_date)
+ self.assertEqual(result, '14:30')
+
+ result = f('lastweek', test_date)
+ self.assertEqual(result, 'Thu, 14:30')
+
+ result = f('lastmonth', test_date)
+ self.assertEqual(result, 'Thu 15, 14:30')
+
+ result = f('older', test_date)
+ self.assertEqual(result, '2023-06-15 14:30')
+
+ result = f('unknown_section', test_date)
+ self.assertEqual(result, '2023-06-15 14:30')
+
Why this scored 15/100
Community notes
Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.
The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.