AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Informational 15 Bitcoin

depends: disable builtin rules and suffixes.

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by Dmitry Goncharov

80/100 · Strong
depends: disable builtin rules and suffixes.

When there is no rule to build a target in the makefile, make looks
for a builtin rule.
When --no-builtin-rules is specified make no longer performs this lookup.

E.g. the following in an excerpt from make -d output.
Here, make looks for a rule to build 'all'.

Considering target file 'all'.
File 'all' does not exist.
Looking for an implicit rule for 'all'.
Trying pattern rule with stem 'all'.
Trying implicit prerequisite 'all.o'.
Trying pattern rule with stem 'all'.
Trying implicit prerequisite 'all.c'.
Trying pattern rule with stem 'all'.
Trying implicit prerequisite 'all.cc'.
Trying pattern rule with stem 'all'.
Trying implicit prerequisite 'all.C'.
Trying pattern rule with stem 'all'.
Trying implicit prerequisite 'all.cpp'.
Trying pattern rule with stem 'all'.
Trying implicit prerequisite 'all.p'.
Trying pattern rule with stem 'all'.
Trying implicit prerequisite 'all.f'.
...
Many more lines like this are omitted.

Because this build system does not use make builtin rules or suffixes,
there is no benefit in having builtin rules enabled.

There are 2 benefits in having builtin rules disabled.

1. Improves performance by eliminating redundant lookups.
2. Simplifies troubleshooting by reducing the output of make -d or
make -p.
✓ Descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Provides detailed explanatory context✓ Explains rationale or failure mode
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit changes the Bitcoin Core dependency build system to tell GNU make to stop searching for built-in pattern rules (like automatically trying to compile a .c file into an .o file). This is purely a performance and debugging cleanup: builds run slightly faster and 'make -d' output is much shorter. There is no security relevance.

Recommended action

No security action needed. Treat as a normal build-system hygiene improvement.

Security signals we found

No strong security signals were identified.

Risk score

Why this scored 15/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 0/30
Exploitability 0/25
Stealth signal 0/15
Affected reach 0/15
Confidence 10/10
Evidence quality 5/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.