AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Informational 15 Bitcoin

Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#35928: doc: mention -DWITH_ZMQ=ON in macOS build guide

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by merge-script

91/100 · Strong
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#35928: doc: mention -DWITH_ZMQ=ON in macOS build guide

222855ed1129669e67785c9800292f017a301816 doc: mention -DWITH_ZMQ=ON in macOS build guide (cyb3ralbert)

Pull request description:

`doc/build-osx.md` currently says:

> Support for ZMQ notifications requires the following dependency.

The `zeromq` dependency is covered, but the `-DWITH_ZMQ=ON` CMake option is not
mentioned anywhere in that section. `WITH_ZMQ` defaults to `OFF`, so following the
guide as written results in a build with ZMQ disabled, even though the user completed
the ZMQ section. I verified this at the configure step on macOS: with `zeromq`
installed and no flag, CMake reports `ZeroMQ ... OFF`; with `-DWITH_ZMQ=ON` it
reports `ON`.

The same wording was added to the BSD build guides in #35283, but `doc/build-osx.md`
was not included.

Docs-only change. No tests run.

ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
ACK 222855ed1129669e67785c9800292f017a301816.

Tree-SHA512: b7e7114e18ef10216780f6b549516c79bff67d7a909c5167f9c48cc8d2ef0b10f1524c7656452308914e5cd86425588f9f2dac07d4eeb2fe1e624f5478453d73
✓ Specific, descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Provides detailed explanatory context✓ Mentions testing or verification✓ Links an issue, advisory, or supporting reference
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This is a one-line documentation update to the macOS build guide. It adds a note telling users to pass a specific CMake option if they want ZeroMQ notification support. There is no code change and no security impact.

Recommended action

No security action needed. Treat as a normal documentation improvement.

Security signals we found

No strong security signals were identified.

Risk score

Why this scored 15/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 0/30
Exploitability 0/25
Stealth signal 0/15
Affected reach 0/15
Confidence 10/10
Evidence quality 5/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.