AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Informational 15 Bitcoin

Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#35937: test: Append print_suppressions=0 to LSAN_OPTIONS, and suppress bitcoin-qt

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by merge-script

91/100 · Strong
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#35937: test: Append print_suppressions=0 to LSAN_OPTIONS, and suppress bitcoin-qt

fad9ab714b5512f204f75a94d8cc4fa164dd4061 test: Append print_suppressions=0 to LSAN_OPTIONS, and suppress bitcoin-qt (MarcoFalke)

Pull request description:

(see commit msg for rationale and background).

To test, one should be able to use the cmake options such as `-DCMAKE_C_COMPILER='clang' -DCMAKE_CXX_COMPILER='clang++' --preset=dev-mode -DBUILD_GUI=ON -DSANITIZERS=address` on e.g. Fedora. Then see that the current suppressions file is insufficient, and also confirm that `print_suppressions=0` is required.

ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK fad9ab714b5512f204f75a94d8cc4fa164dd4061

Tree-SHA512: 1830b4aeb072fa18b76522a124a268073675da14255e469a6d86ee5de52cd08d5613d0c3bd8a66465b0c4636345c9e967923cd1fb516906a58b614fe0e700033
✓ Specific, descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Provides detailed explanatory context✓ Mentions testing or verification✓ Links an issue, advisory, or supporting reference
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit only changes test configuration. It tells the LeakSanitizer tool used during automated testing to stop printing long lists of suppressed memory leaks, and it narrows the list of ignored leaks to the bitcoin-qt GUI test binary. There is no change to the actual Bitcoin Core software that users run, and no security vulnerability is being fixed or introduced.

Recommended action

No security action required. Treat as ordinary test-infrastructure maintenance.

Security signals we found

No strong security signals were identified.

Risk score

Why this scored 15/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 0/30
Exploitability 0/25
Stealth signal 0/15
Affected reach 0/15
Confidence 10/10
Evidence quality 5/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.