AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Informational 18 Bitcoin

ci: fix configure docker action inputs

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by will

90/100 · Strong
ci: fix configure docker action inputs

The options used were wrong in two ways: firstly they were not enforced
as a "choice" (i.e. invalid input valudes could be provided without
error) and one of the options was listed as `gh` when we passed it as
`gha` from ci.yml.

"Fix" this by removing the choice altogether but sanity-testing the
input value against an expected list using a GHA "warning" to notify of
unknown inputs.
✓ Descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Uses a recognizable type or scope✓ Provides detailed explanatory context✓ Mentions testing or verification
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This is a minor fix to a GitHub Actions helper used in Bitcoin Core's continuous integration (CI). The action had a typo in one of its allowed options ('gh' instead of 'gha') and did not actually enforce the list of allowed values. The patch removes the broken option list and instead prints a warning if an unexpected value is provided. It is a workflow-quality fix, not a security patch for Bitcoin's code or network.

Recommended action

No security action required. Treat as a normal CI maintenance commit. Reviewers may optionally verify that ci.yml passes 'gha' and that the warning text is useful for debugging misconfigurations.

Security signals we found

01

No security-relevant code changed

02

CI/GitHub Actions metadata-only change

03

Input validation added as warning, not enforcement

04

No cryptographic, consensus, networking, or wallet changes

Risk score

Why this scored 18/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 2/30
Exploitability 1/25
Stealth signal 1/15
Affected reach 2/15
Confidence 8/10
Evidence quality 4/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.