AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Informational 12 Bitcoin

test: pin the BIP-48 SignMessage permission surface

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by Petr Susil

95/100 · Strong
test: pin the BIP-48 SignMessage permission surface

Add tests covering every BIP-48 path and script type that message signing
accepts or refuses. They record today's behaviour, so later changes show up.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
✓ Specific, descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Uses a recognizable type or scope✓ Provides detailed explanatory context✓ Mentions testing or verification
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit only adds new automated tests for the Bitcoin message-signing feature on Trezor hardware wallets. It does not change the firmware's actual signing behavior; it records which BIP-48 derivation paths and script types are currently allowed, warned, or refused. The goal is to make any future behavior changes visible in test results. There is no fix or functional code change here.

Recommended action

No action required; this is a test-only commit. Reviewers may want to verify that the recorded expected behavior matches the intended security policy for BIP-48 and SLIP-25 paths.

Security signals we found

01

Test-only change with no production code modification

02

Adds regression tests for BIP-48 message signing permission matrix

03

Records current behavior: account-level BIP-48 paths forbidden, leaf paths warned, legacy level signs as P2PKH

04

Includes SLIP-25 path that must remain forbidden without unlock path

Risk score

Why this scored 12/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 0/30
Exploitability 0/25
Stealth signal 0/15
Affected reach 0/15
Confidence 8/10
Evidence quality 4/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.