CommitWatch RSS
AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Low 30 Bitcoin

feat(solana): SLIP-24 for native SOL

TZe5af2a91 View source ↗
Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by Ioan Bizău

57/100 · Thin
feat(solana): SLIP-24 for native SOL

[no changelog]
✓ Descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Uses a recognizable type or scope! No meaningful explanatory body
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit adds support for native Solana (SOL) payment requests using the SLIP-24 standard on Trezor hardware wallets. It extends existing token payment-request logic to also cover plain SOL transfers, and updates tests and UI fixtures accordingly. There is no direct evidence in the commit of a security vulnerability, but any change to payment verification and confirmation flows carries a low level of implementation risk.

Recommended action

Treat as a routine feature commit. Reviewers should verify that PaymentRequestVerifier correctly handles native SOL outputs, that the new confirmation path cannot be bypassed, and that the generalized unit parameter cannot be abused to mislabel tokens. No immediate security response is indicated by the diff alone.

Security signals we found

01

Payment-request verification path modified for native SOL transfers

02

Confirmation UI path changed when verified_payment_request is present

03

New helper get_native_transfer_instructions introduced and used before token fallback

04

Unit display generalized from token.symbol to arbitrary string in confirm_payment_request

05

No explicit bounds checks or validation changes visible in the diff beyond existing verifier usage

Risk score

Why this scored 30/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 5/30
Exploitability 5/25
Stealth signal 5/15
Affected reach 5/15
Confidence 7/10
Evidence quality 3/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.

More from Trezor firmware

Related watches

Informational 18 AI analysisMessage 57 · Thin
TZ TrezorTrezor firmware BitcoinHardware wallets

chore(core): remove sha1 from regular FW

This commit removes the SHA-1 hashing function from the regular Trezor firmware. SHA-1 is an old, weak hash algorithm that is no longer considered secure for sensitive uses. The change deletes the code that exposes SHA-1 to apps running on…

Removal of a deprecated cryptographic primitive (SHA-1) from the firmware API surfaceReduction of attack surface and prevention of future misuse of a collision-vulnerable hashNo direct vulnerability patch or memory-safety bug is present in the diff
16d15774by M1nd3r+0−2006 files
No security note in commit
Open full analysis →Source commit ↗
Low 27 AI analysisMessage 62 · Adequate
TZ TrezorTrezor firmware BitcoinHardware wallets

refactor(crypto): pass static public key to `noise_xxpsk3_*_init()`

This commit changes how a cryptographic library sets up secure connections. Previously, the code automatically calculated the public key from the private key. Now, the caller must provide the public key directly. This is a code-quality ref…

Cryptographic key handling changed: public key is now supplied rather than derivedPotential reduction of key-mismatch risk if caller provides correct public keyNew null-pointer check added for static_public_key
1b3128a4by Ondřej Vejpustek+20−92 files
No security note in commit
Open full analysis →Source commit ↗
Informational 15 AI analysisMessage 57 · Thin
TZ TrezorTrezor firmware BitcoinHardware wallets

refactor(crypto): change order of parameters

This commit simply reorders the arguments of an internal function called dh() and updates every place that calls it. The actual math and security behavior are unchanged; it is a code cleanup with no security effect.

33a119eeby Ondřej Vejpustek+15−151 file
No security note in commit
Open full analysis →Source commit ↗