chore(translations): update Continue for cs
What changed, and why it matters
This commit changes one Czech translation string for the word 'Continue' from 'Pokračujte' to 'Pokračovat', and updates the corresponding translation signature metadata. There is no security relevance.
No security action required. This is a routine localization update.
Security signals we found
No strong security signals were identified.
Evidence from the diff
The diff modifies core/translations/cs.json to change the Czech translation of buttons__continue from ‘Pokračujte’ to ‘Pokračovat’, and updates core/translations/signatures.json with a new merkle_root, datetime, and commit reference. No code logic, cryptographic operations, or security-sensitive behavior is changed.
Changed components
core/translations/cs.jsoncore/translations/signatures.jsonInspect captured patch +4 / −4
diff --git a/core/translations/cs.json b/core/translations/cs.json
index d6bbfe2b..792390fb 100644
--- a/core/translations/cs.json
+++ b/core/translations/cs.json
@@ -373,7 +373,7 @@
},
"buttons__close": "Zavřít",
"buttons__confirm": "Potvrdit",
- "buttons__continue": "Pokračujte",
+ "buttons__continue": "Pokračovat",
"buttons__details": "Podrobnosti",
"buttons__enable": "Zapnout",
"buttons__enter_share": "Zadat podíl",
diff --git a/core/translations/signatures.json b/core/translations/signatures.json
index 0294c308..87dac156 100644
--- a/core/translations/signatures.json
+++ b/core/translations/signatures.json
@@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
{
"current": {
- "merkle_root": "ef8baf61c61acd94c8365c314075627e858667439b2b761460426e1176f6c6eb",
- "datetime": "2026-07-28T11:55:12.764081+00:00",
- "commit": "6318ef3e09e2dc22750541b5f37137b0ec12b585"
+ "merkle_root": "ec479642cebea861b5cafea2961b32ea9a872c18c973e913eed17f225952c552",
+ "datetime": "2026-07-28T15:58:37.144619+00:00",
+ "commit": "7ebd2da01b53c60e517641caa8847dfd867e00e5"
},
"history": [
{
Why this scored 15/100
Community notes
Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.
The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.