AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Low 28 Bitcoin

fix(core): correct BLE interface syshandle

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by Roman Zeyde

57/100 · Thin
fix(core): correct BLE interface syshandle

[no changelog]
✓ Descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Uses a recognizable type or scope! No meaningful explanatory body
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit fixes a hard-coded Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) interface identifier in the Trezor hardware wallet firmware. The old code used a fixed number (8) with a comment saying it should be replaced by the proper system handle. The fix now uses the correct generated constant. Using the wrong identifier could cause the BLE communication interface to be misidentified, which might lead to communication errors or, in a worst-case security scenario, allow an attacker to confuse the device about which channel data is arriving on. The change is small and defensive, but the commit message gives no details about any actual security issue.

Recommended action

Treat as a low-risk correctness fix. Include in routine firmware updates. If the device uses BLE for sensitive communication, verify that interface numbering is consistent across the C and Rust BLE stacks and that channel isolation tests still pass. No urgent security response is indicated by the available evidence.

Security signals we found

01

Hard-coded identifier replaced with generated system constant

02

FIXME comment removed, indicating a known latent bug

03

BLE interface handle correctness fix

04

Potential channel/interface confusion risk

Risk score

Why this scored 28/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 6/30
Exploitability 4/25
Stealth signal 5/15
Affected reach 5/15
Confidence 5/10
Evidence quality 3/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.