AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Informational 13 Bitcoin

chore(deps): bump mako from 1.3.10 to 1.3.11

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by dependabot[bot]

88/100 · Strong
chore(deps): bump mako from 1.3.10 to 1.3.11

Bumps [mako](https://github.com/sqlalchemy/mako) from 1.3.10 to 1.3.11.
- [Release notes](https://github.com/sqlalchemy/mako/releases)
- [Changelog](https://github.com/sqlalchemy/mako/blob/main/CHANGES)
- [Commits](https://github.com/sqlalchemy/mako/commits)

---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: mako
dependency-version: 1.3.11
dependency-type: direct:production
...

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
✓ Descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Uses a recognizable type or scope✓ Provides detailed explanatory context✓ Links an issue, advisory, or supporting reference
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This is a routine automated update by Dependabot that raises the minimum allowed version of a Python template library called Mako from 1.0.7 to 1.3.11. The change only affects build/development dependency files and does not alter Trezor firmware source code. There is no direct evidence in the commit that this fixes a security problem, but keeping dependencies current is generally good maintenance practice.

Recommended action

Treat as routine maintenance. Review Mako 1.3.11 release notes and changelog for any security advisories before merging, but no urgent security action is indicated by this commit alone.

Security signals we found

01

Dependency version bump of a build-time Python package

02

No CVE, advisory, or security rationale mentioned in commit message

03

No code changes to firmware, crypto, or device-interfaces

04

Mako 1.3.11 release is not referenced as a security fix in the supplied materials

Risk score

Why this scored 13/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 2/30
Exploitability 2/25
Stealth signal 1/15
Affected reach 3/15
Confidence 3/10
Evidence quality 2/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.