AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Low 25 Bitcoin

chore(deps): bump cryptography from 46.0.5 to 46.0.6

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by dependabot[bot]

93/100 · Strong
chore(deps): bump cryptography from 46.0.5 to 46.0.6

Bumps [cryptography](https://github.com/pyca/cryptography) from 46.0.5 to 46.0.6.
- [Changelog](https://github.com/pyca/cryptography/blob/main/CHANGELOG.rst)
- [Commits](https://github.com/pyca/cryptography/compare/46.0.5...46.0.6)

---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: cryptography
dependency-version: 46.0.6
dependency-type: direct:production
...

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
✓ Specific, descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Uses a recognizable type or scope✓ Provides detailed explanatory context✓ Links an issue, advisory, or supporting reference
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This is an automated dependency update by Dependabot that bumps the Python 'cryptography' library from version 46.0.5 to 46.0.6 in the project's lock file. The commit itself only changes package hashes and download URLs; it does not modify Trezor's own code. The 'cryptography' library is widely used for encryption and secure communications, so keeping it up to date is generally good security hygiene. However, the commit message does not say this update fixes any specific security problem, and no verified references were provided. Therefore, while dependency updates can address vulnerabilities, we cannot confirm from this commit alone that a particular security issue is being fixed.

Recommended action

Review the upstream 'cryptography' 46.0.6 changelog and any associated security advisories to determine whether this patch release fixes a vulnerability that affects Trezor's use of the library. If it does, ensure the updated lock file is merged and deployed through normal dependency update workflows. If not, treat this as routine maintenance.

Security signals we found

01

Dependency version bump of a cryptographic library

02

Lock-file-only change with no source-code modifications

03

No explicit security fix mentioned in commit message

04

No CVE or advisory reference in commit or supplied materials

Risk score

Why this scored 25/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 5/30
Exploitability 5/25
Stealth signal 5/15
Affected reach 5/15
Confidence 3/10
Evidence quality 2/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.