AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Informational 12 Bitcoin

test(clear_signing): recursion depth tests.

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by PrisionMike

67/100 · Adequate
test(clear_signing): recursion depth tests.

[no changelog]
✓ Descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Uses a recognizable type or scope✓ Mentions testing or verification! No meaningful explanatory body
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit only adds new unit tests for the Ethereum clear-signing feature. It checks that deeply nested data structures are rejected and that shallow-but-wide structures are accepted. No production code is changed, so it cannot by itself introduce or fix a security bug. It does confirm that two existing limits—`_MAX_NESTED_ARRAYS` (2) and `_MAX_ABI_NESTING` (8)—are enforced by the parser.

Recommended action

No action required. Treat as routine test coverage. If reviewing for security, verify that the production parser constants `_MAX_NESTED_ARRAYS` and `_MAX_ABI_NESTING` are actually defined and enforced in the implementation, since the tests assume but do not change them.

Security signals we found

01

Existing parser enforces a hard cap on nested arrays (`_MAX_NESTED_ARRAYS = 2`) to bound parse work.

02

Existing parser enforces a hard cap on ABI recursion depth (`_MAX_ABI_NESTING = 8`) to bound call-stack depth.

03

Tests reference attacker-controlled calldata element counts as the reason for the array cap.

04

No patch to production logic; tests document and lock in current defensive behavior.

Risk score

Why this scored 12/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 0/30
Exploitability 0/25
Stealth signal 0/15
Affected reach 0/15
Confidence 8/10
Evidence quality 4/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.