AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Informational 15 Bitcoin

refactor(python): define `MAX_RETRANSMISSION_COUNT` in `protocol_v2`

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by Roman Zeyde

62/100 · Adequate
refactor(python): define `MAX_RETRANSMISSION_COUNT` in `protocol_v2`

[no changelog]
✓ Specific, descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Uses a recognizable type or scope! No meaningful explanatory body
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit is a simple code cleanup: it replaces a hardcoded number (50) with a named constant (`MAX_RETRANSMISSION_COUNT`) in the Python Trezor library. There is no functional change, no bug fix, and no security relevance visible in the diff.

Recommended action

No security action needed; treat as ordinary refactoring.

Security signals we found

No strong security signals were identified.

Risk score

Why this scored 15/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 0/30
Exploitability 0/25
Stealth signal 0/15
Affected reach 0/15
Confidence 10/10
Evidence quality 5/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.