AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Informational 20 Bitcoin

feat(core/ethereum): support EIP-7702 delegation for `Simple7702Account`

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by Roman Zeyde

100/100 · Strong
feat(core/ethereum): support EIP-7702 delegation for `Simple7702Account`

https://etherscan.io/address/0x4Cd241E8d1510e30b2076397afc7508Ae59C66c9#code
https://ethereum.org/roadmap/pectra/7702/#:~:text=0x4Cd241E8d1510e30b2076397afc7508Ae59C66c9

Also, update "unknown" test case.

[no changelog]
✓ Specific, descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Uses a recognizable type or scope✓ Provides detailed explanatory context✓ Mentions testing or verification✓ Links an issue, advisory, or supporting reference
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit adds support for recognizing one more Ethereum smart-contract account type (Simple7702Account) when signing EIP-7702 delegation authorizations on Trezor hardware wallets. It is a small feature addition that updates a known-address lookup table and adds matching test vectors. There is no indication it fixes a security bug or introduces a vulnerability.

Recommended action

No security action required. Treat as a normal feature commit. Reviewers may verify that the added address matches the published Simple7702Account contract and that the existing EIP-7702 nonce/destination validation rules remain unchanged.

Security signals we found

01

No cryptographic, parsing, or authorization logic is changed beyond adding a recognized address mapping.

02

The change is additive: a previously unknown delegate address is now treated as a known implementation.

03

Test fixtures were updated to cover the new recognized delegate and to keep an 'unknown' error case using a non-recognized address.

04

No vendor disclosure, CVE, or researcher attribution is present in the commit.

Risk score

Why this scored 20/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 2/30
Exploitability 1/25
Stealth signal 1/15
Affected reach 3/15
Confidence 9/10
Evidence quality 4/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.