AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Informational 20 Monero

Masternode UI fix

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by levoncrypto

28/100 · Opaque
Masternode UI fix
✓ Subject identifies a change! No meaningful explanatory body
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit is a UI refactor for the masternode feature in Stack Wallet. It removes a hard-coded note-based detection system for masternode collateral transactions and instead lets the user explicitly start the masternode registration flow from the masternode screen. It also fixes a couple of small UI bugs, such as showing the wrong error message text in slatepack/slate failure dialogs and properly formatting pre-filled amounts in the desktop send form. There is no obvious security vulnerability introduced, but the change removes a large block of auto-detection logic that previously tried to identify 1000-FIRO self-sends as collateral.

Recommended action

Treat as a routine UI/UX refactor. Code reviewers should verify that removing the auto-detection logic does not leave users without a clear path to register masternodes after sending collateral, and that the new `_registeredCollateral()` check correctly matches the UTXO format used by the wallet. The two corrected error-message dialogs should be smoke-tested for Epic Cash sends.

Security signals we found

01

Removal of transaction-note-based collateral detection reduces reliance on user-editable note fields for security-critical state

02

Removal of post-send auto-prompt logic eliminates a class of UI confusion/UX bugs around collateral identification

03

Addition of registered-collateral filtering prevents re-selection of UTXOs already tied to a registered masternode

04

Two dialog content strings corrected from raw exception interpolation to a sanitized errorMessage variable

05

No new cryptographic, network, or permission changes observed

Risk score

Why this scored 20/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 3/30
Exploitability 2/25
Stealth signal 2/15
Affected reach 4/15
Confidence 6/10
Evidence quality 3/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.