Public commit record
40/100 · Thin
What the developer wrote
Authored by sneurlax
fix: use CopyIcon
✓ Subject identifies a change✓ Uses a recognizable type or scope! No meaningful explanatory body
What changed, and why it matters
This commit simply swaps a generic copy icon for a custom project-specific copy icon widget in one screen of the Stack Wallet app. There is no visible security change.
Recommended action
No security action needed. Treat as a normal UI consistency refactor.
Security signals we found
No strong security signals were identified.
Evidence from the diff
The diff replaces the Flutter Material Icon(Icons.copy, size: 14, ...) with a project widget CopyIcon(width: 14, height: 14, ...). The import for CopyIcon is added. No logic, data handling, or security behavior is altered.
Changed components
lib/pages/shopinbit/shopinbit_car_research_payment_view.dartInspect captured patch +4 / −3
diff --git a/lib/pages/shopinbit/shopinbit_car_research_payment_view.dart b/lib/pages/shopinbit/shopinbit_car_research_payment_view.dart
index 40c366d..a7f43dc 100644
--- a/lib/pages/shopinbit/shopinbit_car_research_payment_view.dart
+++ b/lib/pages/shopinbit/shopinbit_car_research_payment_view.dart
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ import '../../widgets/desktop/desktop_dialog_close_button.dart';
import '../../widgets/desktop/primary_button.dart';
import '../../widgets/desktop/secondary_button.dart';
import '../../widgets/dialogs/s_dialog.dart';
+import '../../widgets/icon_widgets/copy_icon.dart';
import '../../widgets/qr.dart';
import '../../widgets/rounded_white_container.dart';
import '../../widgets/stack_dialog.dart';
@@ -780,9 +781,9 @@ class _ShopInBitCarResearchPaymentViewState
: STextStyles.itemSubtitle12(context),
),
const Spacer(),
- Icon(
- Icons.copy,
- size: 14,
+ CopyIcon(
+ width: 14,
+ height: 14,
color: Theme.of(
context,
).extension<StackColors>()!.accentColorBlue,
Risk score
Our methodology →Why this scored 15/100
Human-validated context
Community notes
Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.
No validated notes yet.
The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.