AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Informational 23 Monero

Firo: recognize Spark V2 spend transactions

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by Navid Rahimi

45/100 · Thin
Firo: recognize Spark V2 spend transactions
✓ Descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component! No meaningful explanatory body
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit updates the Stack Wallet app so it can correctly identify a newer kind of Firo cryptocurrency transaction (Spark V2 spends, type 11) in addition to the older Spark V1 spends (type 9). Before this change, the wallet only recognized type 9 as a spend, so a type-11 spend might have been misclassified or mishandled in the user's transaction history and balance calculations. There is no direct evidence in the commit that this misclassification could be exploited by an attacker to steal funds, but it is a correctness fix that could affect balance display and user trust.

Recommended action

Treat as a routine wallet-correctness fix. Review whether the prior misclassification of Spark V2 spends could have caused any balance or transaction-history issues for users, and consider whether additional transaction types need similar recognition. No urgent security patch is indicated by the diff alone.

Security signals we found

01

Transaction-type parsing logic changed to recognize additional spend type

02

Potential prior misclassification of Spark V2 spends could affect balance/UX

03

No input validation, cryptography, or authorization changes visible

04

No vendor disclosure of security relevance in commit or supplied references

Risk score

Why this scored 23/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 5/30
Exploitability 2/25
Stealth signal 3/15
Affected reach 4/15
Confidence 6/10
Evidence quality 3/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.