AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Informational 20 Bitcoin

support retrieving silent payments spscan keys via connected devices

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by Craig Raw

50/100 · Thin
support retrieving silent payments spscan keys via connected devices
✓ Specific, descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component! No meaningful explanatory body
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit adds support for importing a special Bitcoin 'silent payments' scanning key from connected hardware wallets, while explicitly blocking three types of smartcards (Tapsigner, Keycard, Satochip) from being used with silent-payment wallets because they cannot support it. It is a feature addition, not a fix for an active security flaw.

Recommended action

No immediate security action required. Treat as a normal feature commit. If reviewing further, verify that Lark.getSpscanAtPath() correctly validates the derivation path and that the returned SilentPaymentScanAddress is handled safely in downstream wallet code.

Security signals we found

01

New feature: silent payments scan-key import from hardware devices

02

Explicit guard added to reject unsupported card imports for silent-payment wallets

03

No input sanitization change beyond existing derivation-path handling

04

No cryptographic operations implemented in the changed code; calls out to existing Lark/HWI layer

Risk score

Why this scored 20/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 2/30
Exploitability 1/25
Stealth signal 1/15
Affected reach 3/15
Confidence 9/10
Evidence quality 4/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.