AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Low 34 Bitcoin

stop a terminal server test left with back or done, and leave services stopped when tor starts after going offline

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by Craig Raw

60/100 · Adequate
stop a terminal server test left with back or done, and leave services stopped when tor starts after going offline
✓ Specific, descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Mentions testing or verification! No meaningful explanatory body
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit fixes two reliability bugs in the Sparrow Wallet desktop app. First, it prevents a server-connection test from continuing to run in the background after the user leaves the test screen, which could otherwise connect to the wrong server or interfere with later settings. Second, it stops the wallet from automatically restarting network services when the Tor privacy tool comes back online if the user has intentionally gone offline. These are stability and privacy fixes rather than remote-hack vulnerabilities.

Recommended action

Reviewers should verify that no other service success/failure handlers call restartServices() unconditionally, and that all dialog paths that can leave ServerTestDialog set abandoned=true and cancel active services. No immediate user action is required beyond updating to a release containing this commit.

Security signals we found

01

Unintended background network connection to previously or newly configured server after dialog abandonment

02

Automatic service restart on Tor readiness despite user-initiated offline state

03

Stale event-manager registration of a cancelled connection service

04

Cross-thread state flag (volatile abandoned) for GUI/application thread coordination

Risk score

Why this scored 34/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 8/30
Exploitability 4/25
Stealth signal 6/15
Affected reach 5/15
Confidence 7/10
Evidence quality 4/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.