AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Informational 19 Bitcoin

ignore a paynym search result that arrives after the search has changed, and stop enter replacing a pasted payment code search with its abbreviated display

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by Craig Raw

50/100 · Thin
ignore a paynym search result that arrives after the search has changed, and stop enter replacing a pasted payment code search with its abbreviated display
✓ Specific, descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component! No meaningful explanatory body
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit fixes two minor user-interface timing glitches in Sparrow Wallet's PayNym (payment-code alias) search feature. First, it ignores a search result that arrives after the user has already typed something different. Second, it prevents pressing Enter from replacing a pasted full payment code with its shortened on-screen display. These are correctness/UX bugs, not direct theft-of-funds vulnerabilities, but in a wallet they could theoretically contribute to a user sending to the wrong recipient if the screen shows stale or truncated information.

Recommended action

Treat as a routine bug-fix commit. Reviewers may want to confirm that the abbreviated payment code cannot be confused with a full code elsewhere in the send workflow, and that stale async responses are handled consistently across other controllers. No immediate security response is indicated by the diff alone.

Security signals we found

01

UI state desynchronization between async search request and response

02

User input potentially replaced by abbreviated display string on Enter

03

Possible stale search result being rendered after user changed query

04

No input validation, cryptography, or network trust boundary changes visible

Risk score

Why this scored 19/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 3/30
Exploitability 2/25
Stealth signal 2/15
Affected reach 3/15
Confidence 6/10
Evidence quality 3/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.