AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Low 34 Bitcoin

ln: double encrypt errors received from downstream failures

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by Carla Kirk-Cohen

95/100 · Strong
ln: double encrypt errors received from downstream failures

If we're a trampoline node and received an error from downstream that
we can't fully decrypt, we want to double-wrap it for the original
sender. Previously not implemented because we'd only focused on
receives, where there's no possibility of a downstream error.

While proper error handling will be added in a followup, we add the
bare minimum required here for testing.
✓ Specific, descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Provides detailed explanatory context✓ Explains rationale or failure mode✓ Mentions testing or verification
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit adds missing encryption wrapping for error messages in the Lightning Dev Kit when acting as a 'trampoline' forwarding node. Previously, if a downstream node returned an error that the trampoline could not fully decrypt, the error would not be properly re-wrapped for the original sender. The change ensures the error is encrypted with both the trampoline's own shared secret and the incoming shared secret, so it can travel back to the payer correctly. The commit message explicitly says this is the 'bare minimum' and that proper error handling will follow later.

Recommended action

Treat this as a functional correctness fix for trampoline error propagation rather than an active vulnerability. Review the planned followup error-handling work, add tests covering downstream trampoline failures, and monitor for any related disclosures about trampoline error privacy or routing failures.

Security signals we found

01

Missing cryptographic wrapping of failure packets in trampoline forwarding path

02

Potential information leakage or unrecoverable error propagation for trampoline payments

03

Commit describes the change as bare-minimum with followup proper error handling planned

Risk score

Why this scored 34/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 8/30
Exploitability 5/25
Stealth signal 6/15
Affected reach 7/15
Confidence 5/10
Evidence quality 3/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.