AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Low 41 Bitcoin

Use WarnAndDisconnect to fail a splice

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by Jeffrey Czyz

80/100 · Strong
Use WarnAndDisconnect to fail a splice

When the current holder commitment point is unavailable for a channel,
we can't splice the channel. Make sure to disconnect so that the channel
is no longer quiescent. Otherwise, it cannot be used for payments.
✓ Descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Provides detailed explanatory context✓ Explains rationale or failure mode
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This tiny patch changes how one specific splicing failure is handled in a Lightning channel. Previously, when the local node's commitment point was not ready, the code only warned the peer. Now it also disconnects the peer. The goal is to take the channel out of a temporary 'quiet' (quiescent) state so it can be used for normal payments again. Without the disconnect, the channel could get stuck and be unable to process payments after a failed splice attempt. This is a reliability/availability fix rather than a direct theft-of-funds bug.

Recommended action

Treat as a low-to-moderate reliability fix. Review whether other ChannelError::Warn paths during splicing or quiescence could leave the channel stuck. No urgent security deployment is indicated, but node operators should update to avoid stuck channels after failed splice attempts.

Security signals we found

01

Channel state machine fix

02

Quiescence not cleared on failed splice

03

Availability degradation possible

04

No direct cryptographic or signature issue

Risk score

Why this scored 41/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 12/30
Exploitability 5/25
Stealth signal 6/15
Affected reach 8/15
Confidence 7/10
Evidence quality 3/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.