AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Informational 14 Bitcoin

lntest: pin pre-v30 mempool policy defaults in itest bitcoind

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by ziggie

83/100 · Strong
lntest: pin pre-v30 mempool policy defaults in itest bitcoind

Bitcoind v30 lowered the default minrelaytxfee and incrementalrelayfee
from 1000 sat/kvB (1 sat/vB) to 100 sat/kvB. The itest suite was
written against the old defaults and the lower values cascade into:

- integer sat/vByte assertions losing precision below 1 sat/vB, and
- RBF bump thresholds that alter sweeper/bumpfee replacement timing.

Pin the old defaults in the itest bitcoind backend so the existing
tests keep passing without per-test adaptation. Running against the
new defaults is still worth doing, but that is a separate exercise
that should not be bundled with the v30 version bump.
✓ Specific, descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Provides detailed explanatory context✓ Mentions testing or verification
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This change only adjusts the settings used for internal testing of LND with a Bitcoin Core backend. It pins older Bitcoin Core fee defaults so that existing automated tests continue to produce the same results after Bitcoin Core v30 changed its defaults. It does not change production LND code, user-facing behavior, or network consensus rules, and it does not fix a security vulnerability.

Recommended action

No security action required. Treat as a normal test-maintenance commit. If desired, separately track updating the integration tests to exercise Bitcoin Core v30's new default mempool policy values.

Security signals we found

No strong security signals were identified.

Risk score

Why this scored 14/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 0/30
Exploitability 0/25
Stealth signal 0/15
Affected reach 0/15
Confidence 9/10
Evidence quality 5/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.