CommitWatch RSS
AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Informational 17 Bitcoin

tools: bump prometheus client dependency

LL6837d1aa View source ↗
Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by ziggie

68/100 · Adequate
tools: bump prometheus client dependency

Bump the nested tools module's Prometheus client dependency to v1.23.2
and let MVS select the newer common, procfs, and client_model versions
required by that release.

This removes the old Prometheus common v0.4.1 graph edge and drops the
stale github.com/gogo/protobuf v1.1.1 go.mod checksum from tools/go.sum.
✓ Descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Provides detailed explanatory context
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit updates the Prometheus monitoring library and related dependencies inside a developer tools module. It is a routine maintenance change with no direct security fix or code change to the main LND application. The update removes some old, unused dependency entries and refreshes checksums, which is normal housekeeping.

Recommended action

Treat as routine maintenance. Verify the build still passes and dependency licenses remain acceptable. No security response is needed unless a separate advisory identifies a vulnerable version of one of these dependencies.

Security signals we found

01

Dependency bump in a tools-only submodule

02

No application code or logic changes

03

No vendor statement of security relevance

04

No CVE or advisory referenced in commit or diff

05

Routine go.sum cleanup

Risk score

Why this scored 17/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 2/30
Exploitability 1/25
Stealth signal 1/15
Affected reach 2/15
Confidence 8/10
Evidence quality 3/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.

More from LND

Related watches

Moderate 62 AI analysisMessage 58 · Thin
LL Lightning LabsLND BitcoinLightning Network

Merge pull request #11212 from ziggie1984/disable-legacy-channels

This change stops LND from opening new Lightning channels using the old 'legacy' commitment format. The legacy format makes it harder to recover funds if something goes wrong, because the money owed to you is tied to a secret key that chan…

Prevents opening new channels with the legacy commitment type, whose tweaked to_remote output complicates data-loss recoveryCloses a negotiation path where an empty channel_type TLV bypassed feature checks and forced a legacy channelAdds explicit RPC and wire rejection with a dedicated error code
112cb5f3by ziggieXXX+265−4716 files
Vendor flagged security relevance
Open full analysis →Source commit ↗
Moderate 56 AI analysisMessage 73 · Adequate
LL Lightning LabsLND BitcoinLightning Network

Merge pull request #11223 from gijswijs/legacy-dust-retribution-fix

This update fixes a bug in how LND handles old-style punishment transactions when a channel partner tries to cheat. Previously, tiny (dust) HTLCs were left as blank placeholder entries in the punishment data, which could cause the node to …

nil-pointer dereference risk in breach retribution pathlegacy revocation log handling inconsistency with modern formatdefensive hardening added for trimmed/dust HTLCs
500ca51fby ziggieXXX+168−146 files
No security note in commit
Open full analysis →Source commit ↗
Moderate 62 AI analysisMessage 73 · Adequate
LL Lightning LabsLND BitcoinLightning Network

Merge pull request #11190 from Roasbeef/zpay32-reject-duplicate-payment-hashes

This change tightens how LND reads Lightning invoices (BOLT 11). Previously, if an invoice contained more than one payment hash field, LND would silently keep the first one and ignore the rest. Now it rejects the invoice entirely. The rele…

Behavior change from 'use first duplicate field' to 'reject duplicate fields'New error type ErrDuplicatePaymentHash returned on duplicate payment hash fieldsMalformed/unsupported-length duplicate payment hash now treated as duplicate and rejected
86306f89by Yong+147−106 files
No security note in commit
Open full analysis →Source commit ↗