docs: remove release note for DNS fallback panic of 0.22.0
What changed, and why it matters
This commit only removes a sentence from the release notes document for version 0.22.0. It does not change any program code, so it cannot by itself introduce, fix, or alter a security vulnerability. The deleted text described a previously documented bug fix (a daemon crash caused by mishandling DNS records), but the actual code change was made elsewhere and is not present in this commit.
No action is required for this documentation-only change. If reviewing the underlying vulnerability, examine the actual code change in PR #10914 rather than this release-notes edit.
Security signals we found
No strong security signals were identified.
Evidence from the diff
The diff deletes six lines from docs/release-notes/release-notes-0.22.0.md. Those lines referenced PR #10914 and described a panic in DNS fallback SRV lookup due to an unconditional type assertion to *dns.SRV and an out-of-bounds index on empty LookupHost results. No source code is modified. Therefore this commit has no direct security effect on the LND binary.
Changed components
docs/release-notes/release-notes-0.22.0.mdInspect captured patch +0 / −6
diff --git a/docs/release-notes/release-notes-0.22.0.md b/docs/release-notes/release-notes-0.22.0.md
index 22eb449..2f7f0ca 100644
--- a/docs/release-notes/release-notes-0.22.0.md
+++ b/docs/release-notes/release-notes-0.22.0.md
@@ -42,12 +42,6 @@
regardless of peer connectivity. Uptime is now seeded from the peer's
actual connection state.
-* [Fixed a panic](https://github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/pull/10914) in the
- DNS fallback SRV lookup, which unconditionally type-asserted each DNS Answer
- record to `*dns.SRV` and crashed the daemon when the response contained a
- non-SRV record. Non-SRV records are now skipped, and an empty `LookupHost`
- result for the shim no longer triggers an out-of-bounds index.
-
# New Features
## Functional Enhancements
Why this scored 15/100
Community notes
Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.
The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.