What changed, and why it matters
This commit only fixes a code comment by removing an incomplete sentence fragment. No code logic, behavior, or security properties were changed.
Recommended action
No action required; this is a non-security comment-only change.
Security signals we found
No strong security signals were identified.
Evidence from the diff
The diff modifies a single comment line in lnrpc/devrpc/dev_server.go, changing ‘other fields are properly persisted. However,’ to ‘other fields are properly persisted.’ This is a documentation-only cleanup with no functional or security impact.
Changed components
lnrpc/devrpc/dev_server.goInspect captured patch +1 / −1
diff --git a/lnrpc/devrpc/dev_server.go b/lnrpc/devrpc/dev_server.go
index 39c089d..08f01e1 100644
--- a/lnrpc/devrpc/dev_server.go
+++ b/lnrpc/devrpc/dev_server.go
@@ -258,7 +258,7 @@ func (s *Server) ImportGraph(ctx context.Context,
Color: nodeColor,
// NOTE: this is a workaround to ensure that
// HaveAnnouncement() returns true so that the other
- // fields are properly persisted. However,
+ // fields are properly persisted.
AuthSigBytes: []byte{0},
})
Risk score
Our methodology →Why this scored 15/100
Human-validated context
Community notes
Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.
No validated notes yet.
The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.