sqldb/v2: clarify no_sqlite `SqliteStore` intent
What changed, and why it matters
This commit only adds a comment to source code explaining that a placeholder 'SqliteStore' struct exists solely to keep builds working when SQLite support is disabled. No code behavior changed, and there is no security issue.
No action needed; this is a non-functional documentation clarification.
Security signals we found
No strong security signals were identified.
Evidence from the diff
The patch is a documentation-only change in sqldb/v2/no_sqlite.go. It adds a NOTE comment clarifying that the SqliteStore stub under the no_sqlite build tag is not a functional SQLite implementation and exists only to satisfy build-time symbol requirements. No logic, interfaces, or data handling were modified.
Changed components
sqldb/v2/no_sqlite.goInspect captured patch +5 / −0
diff --git a/sqldb/v2/no_sqlite.go b/sqldb/v2/no_sqlite.go
index ee5a272..0665882 100644
--- a/sqldb/v2/no_sqlite.go
+++ b/sqldb/v2/no_sqlite.go
@@ -13,6 +13,11 @@ var (
)
// SqliteStore is a database store implementation that uses a sqlite backend.
+//
+// NOTE: This specific struct implementation does not implement a real sqlite
+// store, and only exists to ensure that build tag environments that do not
+// support sqlite database backends still contain a struct called SqliteStore,
+// to ensure that the build process doesn't error.
type SqliteStore struct {
cfg *SqliteConfig
Why this scored 15/100
Community notes
Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.
The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.