AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Informational 16 Bitcoin

lnrpc: transaction inputs in EstimateFeeRequest

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by Slyghtning

45/100 · Thin
lnrpc: transaction inputs in EstimateFeeRequest
✓ Descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component! No meaningful explanatory body
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit only changes the API definition files (protobuf, generated Go code, and swagger JSON) for LND's EstimateFee RPC. It adds an optional 'inputs' field so callers can specify which transaction inputs to use when estimating fees, and the server can echo back the selected inputs. There is no server-side logic shown in this commit, and nothing in the commit message or diff indicates a security fix or vulnerability.

Recommended action

No immediate security action required. Treat as a normal API schema update. Review the corresponding implementation commit(s) that consume the new 'inputs' field for any coin-selection or validation security implications.

Security signals we found

01

No security-relevant keywords in commit title or message

02

Only protobuf schema and generated code changed

03

No server logic, validation, or authorization changes visible

04

New optional field is additive and does not alter existing behavior

Risk score

Why this scored 16/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 0/30
Exploitability 0/25
Stealth signal 0/15
Affected reach 5/15
Confidence 8/10
Evidence quality 3/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.