AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Informational 15 Bitcoin

refactor: rename `_ecmult_gen` -> `_ecmult_gen_gej` for consistency

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by Sebastian Falbesoner

85/100 · Strong
refactor: rename `_ecmult_gen` -> `_ecmult_gen_gej` for consistency

Now that we have a function `_ecmult_gen_ge`, it makes sense to rename
the existing function `_ecmult_gen` to `_ecmult_gen_gej` for
consistency, to signal that the result is a Jacobian group element.

This diff was created by applying
```
$ sed -i s/secp256k1_ecmult_gen\(/secp256k1_ecmult_gen_gej\(/g $(git ls-files)
```
✓ Specific, descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Uses a recognizable type or scope✓ Provides detailed explanatory context
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit is a simple rename of an internal function from `secp256k1_ecmult_gen` to `secp256k1_ecmult_gen_gej` across six files. The change is purely cosmetic and intended to make the function name consistent with a newly added variant. No behavior, logic, or security properties of the code are changed.

Recommended action

No security action required. Treat as routine code maintenance.

Security signals we found

No strong security signals were identified.

Risk score

Why this scored 15/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 0/30
Exploitability 0/25
Stealth signal 0/15
Affected reach 0/15
Confidence 10/10
Evidence quality 5/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.