app-bitcoin-new rename to app-bitcoin - let's now use the docker image - already deployed after the push on develop
What changed, and why it matters
This commit simply updates a GitHub Actions workflow to use a renamed Docker container image. The old image name contained 'app-bitcoin-new' and the new name contains 'app-bitcoin'. This is a routine repository rename follow-up with no visible security relevance.
No security action needed. Verify the new container image exists and the CI pipeline passes.
Security signals we found
No strong security signals were identified.
Evidence from the diff
A one-line change in .github/workflows/build_and_functional_tests.yml switches the reusable Ragger test workflow’s container_image from ghcr.io/ledgerhq/app-bitcoin-new/speculos-bitcoin:latest to ghcr.io/ledgerhq/app-bitcoin/speculos-bitcoin:latest. The commit message confirms this is because the project was renamed from app-bitcoin-new to app-bitcoin and the new Docker image has already been deployed.
Changed components
.github/workflows/build_and_functional_tests.ymlInspect captured patch +1 / −1
diff --git a/.github/workflows/build_and_functional_tests.yml b/.github/workflows/build_and_functional_tests.yml
index a871b2a..155e905 100644
--- a/.github/workflows/build_and_functional_tests.yml
+++ b/.github/workflows/build_and_functional_tests.yml
@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ jobs:
uses: LedgerHQ/ledger-app-workflows/.github/workflows/reusable_ragger_tests.yml@v1
with:
download_app_binaries_artifact: "compiled_app_binaries"
- container_image: "ghcr.io/ledgerhq/app-bitcoin-new/speculos-bitcoin:latest"
+ container_image: "ghcr.io/ledgerhq/app-bitcoin/speculos-bitcoin:latest"
# when merging a PR, we run the tests with the --enable_slow_tests parameter
test_options: ${{ github.event_name == 'push' && '--enable_slow_tests' || '' }}
regenerate_snapshots: ${{ github.event_name == 'workflow_dispatch' && inputs.golden_run == 'Open a PR' }}
Why this scored 15/100
Community notes
Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.
The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.