CommitWatch RSS
AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Informational 19 Bitcoin

Publish package to jfrog through reusable_npm_deployment.yml

LD7037e2b3 View source ↗
Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by Mathias BROUSSET

50/100 · Thin
Publish package to jfrog through reusable_npm_deployment.yml
✓ Specific, descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component! No meaningful explanatory body
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit is a packaging and publishing workflow change for Ledger's Bitcoin JavaScript client. It adds a GitHub Actions workflow to publish the package to JFrog and npm, renames the package from 'ledger-bitcoin' to '@ledgerhq/ledger-bitcoin', removes ESLint tooling, and adjusts published files. There is no direct evidence of a security vulnerability in the code changes, but the workflow pins to a non-default branch of a reusable workflow ('mbr/reusable-workflow-jfrog-npm') and removes linting tools, which slightly weakens supply-chain assurance.

Recommended action

Review the reusable workflow at LedgerHQ/ledger-app-workflows@mbr/reusable-workflow-jfrog-npm for credential handling, registry tokens, and provenance. Pin the workflow reference to a stable tag or commit SHA. Confirm that removing ESLint is intentional and does not reduce static-analysis coverage. Verify that the 'files' whitelist does not omit required runtime assets or include unintended build artifacts.

Security signals we found

01

New CI/CD workflow publishing to external registry (JFrog/npm)

02

Reusable workflow referenced from a feature branch rather than a tagged release or default branch

03

Removal of ESLint and related linting plugins from devDependencies

04

Package rename and 'files' whitelist change affecting published artifact contents

Risk score

Why this scored 19/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 2/30
Exploitability 3/25
Stealth signal 4/15
Affected reach 5/15
Confidence 3/10
Evidence quality 2/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.

More from Ledger Bitcoin app

Related watches

Moderate 59 AI analysisMessage 68 · Adequate
LD LedgerLedger Bitcoin app BitcoinHardware wallets

Merge pull request #542 from LedgerHQ/musig-fixes

This commit fixes missing error handling in the Ledger Bitcoin app's MuSig2 multi-signature code. Several cryptographic functions could fail silently or return incorrect results because their error codes were ignored. The patch now checks …

Missing error propagation in cryptographic point operationsUnchecked return value of crypto_tr_lift_x could lead to use of an unspecified pointUnchecked point_add return value in key aggregation, nonce aggregation, and tweaking
0fec192fby Salvatore Ingala+21−63 files
No security note in commit
Open full analysis →Source commit ↗
Moderate 59 AI analysisMessage 65 · Adequate
LD LedgerLedger Bitcoin app BitcoinHardware wallets

Fix missing return value checks for point_add calls

This commit fixes three places in the Ledger Bitcoin app's MuSig2 code where the result of an elliptic-curve point-addition operation was not checked for failure. If point_add fails (for example, because it produced the special 'point at i…

Unchecked cryptographic operation return value (point_add)Potential use of invalid/infinite elliptic-curve point in MuSig2 aggregationMuSig2 nonce aggregation failure path now returns correct cosigner index
b1132395by Salvatore Ingala+14−52 files
No security note in commit
Open full analysis →Source commit ↗
Moderate 59 AI analysisMessage 45 · Thin
LD LedgerLedger Bitcoin app BitcoinHardware wallets

Propagate crypto_tr_lift_x errors in cpoint

This commit fixes a small but meaningful bug in the Ledger Bitcoin app's code that handles advanced multi-signature (MuSig) operations. A function called crypto_tr_lift_x can fail when given an invalid x-coordinate that does not correspond…

Unchecked return value from cryptographic point-lifting functionPotential use of invalid/uninitialized curve point in MuSig signing flowMissing error propagation in compressed public-key parsing
18647877by Salvatore Ingala+7−12 files
No security note in commit
Open full analysis →Source commit ↗