Bump version of python client to 0.4.1 and update CHANGELOG
What the developer wrote
Authored by Ilya Artemov
Bump version of python client to 0.4.1 and update CHANGELOG
What changed, and why it matters
This commit is a routine version bump and changelog update for the Python client library. It adds a note that the new version supports an existing device command used to read a wallet fingerprint. There are no code changes to the app's security logic, no bug fixes, and no vulnerability indicators.
No security action needed. Treat as a normal release bookkeeping commit.
Security signals we found
No strong security signals were identified.
Evidence from the diff
The diff only modifies bitcoin_client/ledger_bitcoin/__init__.py to change __version__ from ‘0.4.0’ to ‘0.4.1’, and updates bitcoin_client/CHANGELOG.md to document support for INS_GET_MASTER_FINGERPRINT for the legacy app. No functional code, parsing logic, cryptography, or authorization checks are altered.
Changed components
bitcoin_client/ledger_bitcoin/__init__.pybitcoin_client/CHANGELOG.mdInspect captured patch +7 / −1
diff --git a/bitcoin_client/CHANGELOG.md b/bitcoin_client/CHANGELOG.md
index ff9f895..d4d96e2 100644
--- a/bitcoin_client/CHANGELOG.md
+++ b/bitcoin_client/CHANGELOG.md
@@ -7,6 +7,12 @@ and this project adheres to [Semantic Versioning](https://semver.org/spec/v2.0.0
Dates are in `dd-mm-yyyy` format.
+## [0.4.1] - 16-04-2026
+
+### Added
+
+- Support for `INS_GET_MASTER_FINGERPRINT` (for legacy app)
+
## [0.4.0] - 06-03-2025
### Added
diff --git a/bitcoin_client/ledger_bitcoin/__init__.py b/bitcoin_client/ledger_bitcoin/__init__.py
index 1374dee..9a2a278 100644
--- a/bitcoin_client/ledger_bitcoin/__init__.py
+++ b/bitcoin_client/ledger_bitcoin/__init__.py
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ from .common import Chain
from .wallet import AddressType, WalletPolicy, MultisigWallet, WalletType
-__version__ = '0.4.0'
+__version__ = '0.4.1'
__all__ = [
"Client",
Why this scored 15/100
Community notes
Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.
The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.