What changed, and why it matters
This commit fixes a spelling mistake inside a code comment, removing an unnecessary semicolon. It does not change any executable code, logic, or behavior of the Bitcoin app.
Recommended action
No security action needed; this is a cosmetic documentation-only change.
Security signals we found
No strong security signals were identified.
Evidence from the diff
The diff changes a single line in src/handler/sign_psbt/sign_input.c: the comment ‘// keypath spend;’ is corrected to ‘// keypath spend’. No instructions, control flow, data structures, or cryptographic operations are modified.
Changed components
Not specified
Inspect captured patch +1 / −1
diff --git a/src/handler/sign_psbt/sign_input.c b/src/handler/sign_psbt/sign_input.c
index 9b6a610..78ef3b1 100644
--- a/src/handler/sign_psbt/sign_input.c
+++ b/src/handler/sign_psbt/sign_input.c
@@ -422,7 +422,7 @@ static bool __attribute__((noinline)) sign_transaction_input(dispatcher_context_
size_t tweak_data_len = 0;
const uint8_t *tapleaf_hash = NULL;
if (!keyexpr_info->is_tapscript) {
- // keypath spend;
+ // keypath spend
if (isnull_policy_node_tree(&policy->tree)) {
// tweak as specified in BIP-86 and BIP-386
tweak_data = (uint8_t[]){};
Risk score
Our methodology →Why this scored 15/100
Human-validated context
Community notes
Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.
No validated notes yet.
The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.