AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Low 33 Bitcoin

Delete the hash context before return in compute_rand_i_j

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by Salvatore Ingala

73/100 · Adequate
Delete the hash context before return in compute_rand_i_j

Defense-in-depth: once partial signatures are known, rand_i_j is
sensitive data, and the hash context might allow retrieving it if
leaked.
✓ Specific, descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Provides detailed explanatory context
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit adds a memory wipe of a cryptographic hash context after it is used to derive a secret random value in the Ledger Bitcoin app's MuSig multi-signature code. The change is described by the developer as a 'defense-in-depth' measure: once partial signatures are public, the internal randomness used to create them becomes sensitive, and leftover data in memory could theoretically help an attacker if they later gained access to the device's memory. There is no evidence this issue was exploited or publicly disclosed as a security vulnerability.

Recommended action

Treat as a low-risk hardening improvement. Review whether other MuSig/Musig2 functions that handle signing nonces, secret shares, or hash contexts perform similar explicit zeroing. No urgent user action is indicated.

Security signals we found

01

explicit_bzero added to clear sensitive cryptographic context

02

MuSig signing randomness treated as sensitive after partial signatures are known

03

Defense-in-depth memory hygiene patch

04

No bug fix, CVE, or exploit mechanism described in commit

Risk score

Why this scored 33/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 8/30
Exploitability 4/25
Stealth signal 6/15
Affected reach 5/15
Confidence 7/10
Evidence quality 3/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.