AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Informational 24 Bitcoin

python client: use default value for nSequence if not given

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by Salvatore Ingala

65/100 · Adequate
python client: use default value for nSequence if not given

Matches BIP-370 and HWI's implementation upstream.
✓ Specific, descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Provides an explanatory body
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit fixes a small bug in the Python helper library that builds unsigned Bitcoin transactions from PSBT data. Previously, if a PSBT did not explicitly include a per-input sequence number, the code would crash with an assertion error. The change follows the BIP-370 standard and HWI by treating a missing sequence number as the default final value (0xffffffff). This is a client-side convenience fix; it does not change how the Ledger device itself validates or signs transactions.

Recommended action

Treat as a minor bugfix / spec-compliance improvement. Review whether any downstream code relied on the assertion to reject malformed PSBTs, and verify that the default sequence value is only applied where BIP-370 permits it. No urgent security response is indicated by the diff alone.

Security signals we found

01

Behavioral change in transaction serialization helper

02

Removes an assertion that could cause crashes on valid PSBTs missing optional sequence fields

03

Aligns implementation with BIP-370 and HWI upstream behavior

04

No evidence of memory corruption, cryptographic, or device-level vulnerability in the diff

Risk score

Why this scored 24/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 4/30
Exploitability 3/25
Stealth signal 3/15
Affected reach 5/15
Confidence 6/10
Evidence quality 3/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.