AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Moderate 59 Bitcoin

Merge pull request #542 from LedgerHQ/musig-fixes

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by Salvatore Ingala

68/100 · Adequate
Merge pull request #542 from LedgerHQ/musig-fixes

Add some missing error propagation in `musig.c`
✓ Descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Provides an explanatory body✓ Links an issue, advisory, or supporting reference
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit fixes missing error handling in the Ledger Bitcoin app's MuSig2 multi-signature code. Several cryptographic functions could fail silently or return incorrect results because their error codes were ignored. The patch now checks those return values and aborts the signing process when something goes wrong. It also corrects a debug-print index so a disruptive co-signer is reported with the right number.

Recommended action

Treat this as a security-hardening fix and include it in the next release. Review whether any earlier code path could have produced an invalid MuSig signature or leaked information through side channels before the patch. Add regression tests that supply out-of-curve coordinates and point-addition failure conditions.

Security signals we found

01

Missing error propagation in cryptographic point operations

02

Unchecked return value of crypto_tr_lift_x could lead to use of an unspecified point

03

Unchecked point_add return value in key aggregation, nonce aggregation, and tweaking

04

Potential infinite or invalid curve points propagated through MuSig2 signing flow

05

Debug-only error path in nonce aggregation now returns failure instead of continuing

Risk score

Why this scored 59/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 18/30
Exploitability 12/25
Stealth signal 8/15
Affected reach 10/15
Confidence 7/10
Evidence quality 4/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.