AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Low 41 Bitcoin

fix: zcash transparent is not signing

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by soralit

57/100 · Thin
fix: zcash transparent is not signing
✓ Descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Uses a recognizable type or scope! No meaningful explanatory body
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This is a one-line build-configuration fix for the Keystone hardware wallet's Zcash transparent transaction signing. Previously, the code that signs the transparent (non-shielded) part of a Zcash PCZT transaction was only compiled when the 'multi_coins' feature was enabled. The change also enables that signing code when the 'cypherpunk' feature is enabled. Without this fix, a device built with only the 'cypherpunk' feature could produce an incomplete or invalid Zcash transaction signature, likely causing the transaction to be rejected by the network rather than stealing funds.

Recommended action

Verify the fix with a cypherpunk-only build by signing a Zcash transaction that contains transparent inputs and confirming the resulting PCZT includes valid transparent signatures. Review other #[cfg(feature = "multi_coins")] guards in the Zcash app for similar omissions. Consider whether the cypherpunk feature should imply multi_coins or whether all signing paths need explicit dual gating.

Security signals we found

01

Functional bug in cryptographic signing path

02

Build-feature conditional compilation error

03

Could produce invalid/incomplete transaction signatures

04

No explicit security claim in commit message

Risk score

Why this scored 41/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 12/30
Exploitability 5/25
Stealth signal 8/15
Affected reach 7/15
Confidence 6/10
Evidence quality 3/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.