What changed, and why it matters
This commit only edits the formatting and wording of a product changelog. It adds blank lines and changes headings like 'BTC-ONLY' to 'BTC Only' and 'CYPHERPUNK' to 'Cypherpunk'. No code, configuration, or security-related content was changed.
No action needed. This is a documentation-only formatting commit with no security relevance.
Security signals we found
No strong security signals were identified.
Evidence from the diff
The diff is limited to two Markdown changelog files (CHANGELOG.md and CHANGELOG-ZH.md). Changes are cosmetic: inserting blank lines, normalizing section header capitalization, and reformatting whitespace. No source files, build scripts, dependencies, or documentation with security implications were modified.
Changed components
Inspect captured patch +10 / −4
diff --git a/CHANGELOG-ZH.md b/CHANGELOG-ZH.md
index 571701d..7a1e42c 100644
--- a/CHANGELOG-ZH.md
+++ b/CHANGELOG-ZH.md
@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
## 2.3.0(2025-12-02)
**Web3:**
+
### 新增
1. 支持通过 BlueWallet 管理 BTC Taproot 地址
### 优化
@@ -10,8 +11,8 @@
### Bug Fixes
1. 修复 Passphrase 钱包下 Eternl 地址 path 类型同步问题
+**BTC Only:**
-**BTC-ONLY:**
### 新增
1. 支持通过 BlueWallet 管理 BTC Taproot 地址
### 优化
@@ -20,7 +21,8 @@
-**CYPHERPUNK:**
+**Cypherpunk:**
+
### 新增
1. 支持通过 BlueWallet 管理 BTC Taproot 地址
### 优化
diff --git a/CHANGELOG.md b/CHANGELOG.md
index 6809282..5e9a498 100644
--- a/CHANGELOG.md
+++ b/CHANGELOG.md
@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
**Web3:**
+
### What's new
1. Support managing BTC Taproot addresses via BlueWallet
### Improvements
@@ -13,7 +14,9 @@
1. Fixed address path type synchronization issue for Eternl under Passphrase wallets
-**BTC-ONLY:**
+
+**BTC Only:**
+
### What's new
1. Support managing BTC Taproot addresses via BlueWallet
### Improvements
@@ -21,7 +24,8 @@
2. Optimized BTC Sign Message workflow
-**CYPHERPUNK:**
+**Cypherpunk:**
+
### What's new
1. Support managing BTC Taproot addresses via BlueWallet
### Improvements
Why this scored 15/100
Community notes
Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.
The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.