What changed, and why it matters
This is a routine build-fix commit. It corrects a typo in a function name (GetXpubPath to GetXPubPath) and adds a missing newline at the end of a hash file. There is no security-relevant change.
Recommended action
No security action needed. Treat as normal build fix.
Security signals we found
No strong security signals were identified.
Evidence from the diff
The commit fixes a compilation error in gui_wallet.c by changing GetXpubPath to GetXPubPath (case correction) and adds a trailing newline to images_hash.txt. These are build hygiene changes with no functional or security impact.
Changed components
src/ui/gui_wallet/multi/web3/gui_wallet.csrc/ui/gui_assets/images_hash.txtInspect captured patch +2 / −3
diff --git a/src/ui/gui_assets/images_hash.txt b/src/ui/gui_assets/images_hash.txt
index a42b64d..75bdaea 100644
--- a/src/ui/gui_assets/images_hash.txt
+++ b/src/ui/gui_assets/images_hash.txt
@@ -1 +1 @@
-3d66af5fbec309939aa9cc27ea7895eb
\ No newline at end of file
+3d66af5fbec309939aa9cc27ea7895eb
diff --git a/src/ui/gui_wallet/multi/web3/gui_wallet.c b/src/ui/gui_wallet/multi/web3/gui_wallet.c
index fbc6226..92be800 100644
--- a/src/ui/gui_wallet/multi/web3/gui_wallet.c
+++ b/src/ui/gui_wallet/multi/web3/gui_wallet.c
@@ -471,8 +471,7 @@ UREncodeResult *GuiGetKeystoneConnectWalletData(void)
{.path = GetXPubPath(XPUB_TYPE_XRP), .chainType = XPUB_TYPE_XRP},
{.path = GetXPubPath(XPUB_TYPE_LTC), .chainType = XPUB_TYPE_LTC},
{.path = GetXPubPath(XPUB_TYPE_LTC_NATIVE_SEGWIT), .chainType = XPUB_TYPE_LTC_NATIVE_SEGWIT},
- {.path = GetXpubPath(XPUB_TYPE_ZEC_TRANSPARENT_LEGACY), .chainType = XPUB_TYPE_ZEC_TRANSPARENT_LEGACY}
-
+ {.path = GetXPubPath(XPUB_TYPE_ZEC_TRANSPARENT_LEGACY), .chainType = XPUB_TYPE_ZEC_TRANSPARENT_LEGACY},
};
ExtendedPublicKey keys[NUMBER_OF_ARRAYS(chainPaths)];
uint8_t mfp[4] = {0};
Risk score
Our methodology →Why this scored 15/100
Human-validated context
Community notes
Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.
No validated notes yet.
The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.