AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Moderate 66 Bitcoin

Merge pull request #661 from Foundation-Devices/fix/seedqr-validation

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by Jacksper13

58/100 · Thin
Merge pull request #661 from Foundation-Devices/fix/seedqr-validation

Reject malformed SeedQR payloads
✓ Specific, descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Links an issue, advisory, or supporting reference! No meaningful explanatory body
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This update tightens the checks on SeedQR codes, which are QR codes that encode a wallet's backup seed phrase as numbers. Before, the decoder might accept invalid or oddly-sized numeric strings and either crash or produce an incorrect seed. Now it rejects anything that isn't the right length, isn't all digits, or contains word index numbers that are too high. This protects users from importing a corrupted or attacker-crafted seed that could lead to an unusable or insecure wallet.

Recommended action

Treat this as a security-hardening fix and include it in the next firmware release. Run the new unit tests on target hardware and consider adding integration tests for the camera-based SeedQR scanning path to ensure malformed QR codes are rejected with a clear user-facing error.

Security signals we found

01

Input validation added to seed-import path

02

Out-of-range BIP-39 word index now rejected explicitly

03

Non-digit characters rejected before integer conversion

04

Length and word-count validation moved ahead of decoding

05

New unit tests cover valid and malformed SeedQR payloads

Risk score

Why this scored 66/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 22/30
Exploitability 14/25
Stealth signal 8/15
Affected reach 10/15
Confidence 8/10
Evidence quality 4/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.